November 2009 ·
Readings
·
Previous
·
Next
PDF |
From the trial of Carl Worthington of Oregon City, Oregon, who was charged with manslaughter after his fifteen-month-old daughter Ava died last March of bronchial pneumonia and a blood infection that could have been cured with antibiotics. Instead of seeking medical treatment, Worthington and his wife, Raylene, with family and other members of the Followers of Christ, prayed and conducted faith-healing rituals. In July, Worthington was found guilty of criminal mistreatment, a misdemeanor, and sentenced to sixty days in jail. Greg Horner was the prosecutor.
greg horner: Let’s start with your beliefs about the use of modern medicine. You don’t believe in modern medicine. Isn’t that correct?
carl worthington: I don’t know that I’d say that I don’t believe in it. I don’t put my faith in it, would be a better term.
horner: You don’t use modern medicine as a means of addressing illness. Is that correct?
worthington: Right. If I can anoint someone with olive oil and he starts feeling better, then there’s no need to use medicine.
horner: Well, it’s a little bit more than that, though, isn’t it? It’s not whether they get better or not. It’s just that you don’t believe in using modern medicine.
worthington: It has to do a lot with how they do. If I never seemed to get better, then why would I do it? I would probably use modern medicine myself. I’ve never felt that I’ve needed it. It wasn’t because somebody forced this on me. It’s because I seen it for myself, as I was growing up. When I was anointed, I felt better, so that trained me to have faith in it.
horner: Has your position changed as a result of what happened to your daughter?
worthington: No, it’s still the same.
horner: So the fact that you did not get your daughter to a hospital Saturday night, and she died a day later, has not changed your position on modern medicine?
worthington: Well, it hasn’t changed the way I feel. I’ve seen nothing here that’s proved to me that it would have been any different had we taken her in. When a doctor can’t do nothing for you, you usually put it in God’s hands anyways, so that’s where I’d had it the whole time.
horner: Even in retrospect, even knowing the outcome, you wouldn’t change how you handled her medical condition?
worthington: There’s nothing they’ve done to prove that they could have cured her. What I got was a maybe yeah, maybe no. They wasn’t sure.
horner: You acknowledge, then, that, gosh, maybe if I’d taken her in, she’d be alive today?
worthington: I don’t believe so, no.
horner: Well, that’s what you said about what the doctors would say. But for you, it was more important to follow your faith. Isn’t that right?
worthington: My point is that if the medicine hadn’t worked, the doctor would tell you to put your faith in God anyway. They’d say there’s nothing more we can do for you. That’s where my faith and trust was, so it sounds like there’s a good chance that’s where I would have ended up anyway.
horner: Getting back to the question about whether or not you were willing to ignore the medical likelihood, that had your child been taken in Saturday night, she would have survived—you were willing to take the chance that that wouldn’t happen. Is that right?
worthington: What chance are we talking about here?
horner: The chance of Ava dying.
worthington: When?
horner: Saturday night.
worthington: Saturday night? I didn’t think she was doing that bad Saturday night. She started off like she was coming down with a cold. I mean, does everyone take their kids in every time they have a cold?
horner: No, they don’t. But they do take their child in when they’ve got a huge growth on their neck, and they’re choking, and having difficulty breathing, and the father thinks that there’s a possibility they’re going to die!
worthington: I don’t recall her ever choking. There was a moment after she hadn’t slept all night when I was worried that she was getting weak, and then I saw her take her bottle and hoist it up with one arm by herself, and she showed me she was strong.
horner: So you see her lift up a bottle with one hand, and that’s enough for you to say, Okay, I’m willing to take my chances with prayer?
worthington: Well, it was an improvement. And we wanted to see a bigger improvement. We did see that bigger improvement that evening, after we’d laid hands on her again.
horner: Had she declined, you would have been on the phone to 911 and got that child to the hospital? Is that what you’re saying?
worthington: That’s an impossible question to answer. It’s possible that someone could lose their faith if they’re not getting the results they want. But why would you take them to a doctor if they’re getting better?
horner: You take them to a doctor because if you don’t, the bacteria and the pneumonia kills them. Does that make sense to you?
worthington: Say it again.
horner: You said, “Why would you take a child into the doctor?” The answer is, you take them in because they die from bacteria, pneumonia and swelling. Does that make sense?
worthington: I didn’t know she had a pneumonia, I didn’t know any of that.
horner: Why was it that you didn’t know that?
worthington: I’m not a doctor, I guess.
Sorry—the full text of this item is only available to Harper's Magazine subscribers. Subscribe today for as little as $16.97 per year!
Already a subscriber? Register your subscription. Already registered? Log in at the top of this page.
If you've logged in but are still seeing this message: hold down the “shift” key on your keyboard and click the reload button at the top of your browser window.
| ||
| SEE ALSO: Worthington, Carl; Doctrines; Healing; Infants; Medicine; Oregon; Spiritual healing; Trials, litigation, etc. | ||
| Previous · Next |
| December 2009 THE GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPERFRAUD
THE MASTER OF SPIN BOLDAK
MERMAID FEVER
UNDERSTANDING OBAMACARE
Also: Dave Hickey and Wendell Berry |