Easy Chair — From the February 2013 issue

Team America

( 3 of 5 )

That was the initial phase of the book’s rocketlike ascent into the middlebrow empyrean. The second stage, as I mentioned, came during the 2008 election season, after Team of Rivals was endorsed by Barack Obama. That’s when it occurred to pundit after pundit that the book was about something that should properly warm the heart of every American: bipartisanship. The Obama/Lincoln comparison was suddenly the great cliché of the moment — it made the cover of Time in October and the cover of Newsweek in November. And once the election was over, the possibility of an executive-branch team of rivals became a fixation of our intellectual politburo.

Soon they were busily quizzing one another as to whether each new cabinet nominee fit the “team of rivals” template. Hillary Clinton obviously did, and the same might be said of Larry Summers and the Republican Robert Gates. When Obama nominated another Republican, Judd Gregg, for commerce secretary, the Lincoln comparisons flew; when he sought out the opinions of his recent antagonist John McCain, they soared. In a conversation with Tom Brokaw, NBC reporter Andrea Mitchell noted how Team of Rivals (by “our colleague and friend Doris Kearns Goodwin”) had influenced Obama, then suggested some additional rivals the president-elect might care to embrace:

He has John McCain coming tomorrow to Chicago. That is a very important step, they say. . . . There are others who have been mentioned: Chuck Hagel and, we know, Bob Gates at Defense, and other Republicans — his good friend Dick Lugar, who has not been persuaded to come to the State Department so far. So he really sees this in a very bipartisan way, in the true spirit of that.

Mitchell’s juxtaposition of “friends,” “rivals,” and “bipartisan” helps us understand the high-octane appeal of this plodding idea. To a modern-day Washington grandee, what assembling a team of rivals means is that glorious thing: an election with virtually no consequences. No one is sentenced to political exile because he or she was on the wrong side; the presidency changes hands, but all the players still get a seat at the table.

The only ones left out of this warm, bipartisan circle of friendship are the voters, who wake up one fine day to discover that what they thought they’d rejected wasn’t rejected in the least. And all in the name of Abraham Lincoln. Thanks for that, Abe.


More from Thomas Frank:

Get access to 165 years of
Harper’s for only $45.99

United States Canada

  • Emily

    I’m not a subscriber, but I’d love to read this article. Just FYI, I’d be willing to pay for access to individual articles.

  • Jerry Brown California Governo

    Lincoln was a great movie. The mystic vision and sense of the union combined with the down to earth manner of the president was perfect. I was inspired.

  • Steve

    What a douchey essay. Could the author have tried to make his point in a less blase and condescending manner? Probably not, because I don’t see much actual evidence of his point, like, gee I don’t know, quotes from the actual book. Just a lot of general conjecture and name-calling.

  • wiseacre1

    I saw the movie,and did not come away with a sense that corruption was cute and necessary to advance a good cause. I think most viewers understand the difference between using humour as a device to relieve dramatic tension,and the reality of sleazy politics. I found the movie inspiring and demoralizing at the same time,in other words,a fairly honest rendition of the human condition.

  • John T.

    I, for one, appreciated this piece very much. Strong writing and unconventional thinking make for a much better critical review than eye batting and jaw dropping. Of course Daniel Day Lewis was outstanding, and of course Spielberg produced a compelling drama. They’re professionals, that’s what they do. The point is that there are professionals in every arena, and professional politicians should be should be cast in a (fair) light that doesn’t radiate with the moral glow of abolitionism. If were talking about compromise, let’s compromise about which administration should be portrayed so that compromise, itself, as a political ideal, can be met on level ground, instead of just snowballing downhill with the weight of glamour and popularity.

  • Sam J

    ..Download these 54 masterfully designed business book cliff notes that will Skyrocket your business and Change your Destiny forever. http://www.TheBillionairesBrain.com


October 2015

Lives by Omission

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Lifting as We Climb

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Cattle Calls

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Getting Jobbed

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

view Table Content