Letter from Washington — From the December 2013 issue

Secretary of Nothing

John Kerry and the myth of foreign policy

Download Pdf
Read Online

When former president Bill Clinton nominated Barack Obama for a second term at the 2012 Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, North Carolina, the hall was packed to the rafters with party dignitaries. One was conspicuous by her absence: Hillary Clinton, away on diplomatic business in East Timor. “For decades,” she said by way of explanation, “secretaries of state have not attended political conventions because of the nonpartisan nature of our foreign policy.”

Politicians love being thought of as nonpartisan and above the murky fray. That must explain why so many of them want to be secretary of state, even though the office confers little power of patronage (its choicest appointments — ambassadorships — being sold off by the president to the highest bidder), a puny budget, and none of the authority that comes from the ability to kill people or make them rich.

Nevertheless, two people very definitely wanted to be secretary of state in the first Obama Administration: Senator John F. Kerry of Massachusetts and Governor Bill Richardson of New Mexico. Both deny it, of course. But Democratic Party sources insist that Obama, locked in a bitter nomination battle with Hillary Clinton, offered both men the coveted post in hopes of gaining their support when he needed it.

This article is only available to magazine subscribers. If you are a subscriber, please sign in. If you aren't, please subscribe below and get access to the entire Harper's archive for only $39.99/year. Or purchase this issue on your iOS or Android devices for $6.99.

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Download Pdf
Share
is the Washington editor of Harper’s Magazine. He writes frequently on defense and national affairs, and is the author, most recently, of Rumsfeld: His Rise, Fall, and Catastrophic Legacy.

More from Andrew Cockburn:

Get access to 164 years of
Harper’s for only $39.99

United States Canada

  • J Borg

    I find this article a bit too cynical and devoid of fact. if the Kerry crew is keeping to itself, why should I take the opinion of those floating at the periphery as anything more than office gossip and innuendo? What about talking to the man himself and getting an official reaction?

    I’m daring to hope that we are at the cusp of some momentous changes for the better in the middle-east and cynicism, though healthy in moderate amounts, can be very deflating. I’d like to think that Kerry is really trying to negotiate a wider and larger peace that involves the big players who have historically been goaded and pummelled by the west for over a century, Egypt for over three of them.

  • Reid Singer

    It is really, really easy to make the argument that American foreign policy has always been tethered to domestic bickering and internal spats. Nor did the author have to dig deep for signs that Kerry’s sense progress in the Middle East may be chimeric, or that AIPAC is run by a small group of crazy people with way too much power. It’s hard to say how what this article adds to that — besides some office gossip, lots of unnamed sources, and sweeping cynicism (I agree with J Borg).

THE CURRENT ISSUE

January 2015

Come With Us If You Want to Live

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

The Body Politic

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

The Problem of Pain Management

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Game On

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Love Crimes

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

view Table Content