Get Access to Print and Digital for $23.99 per year.
Subscribe for Full Access
Adjust

From an interview conducted by Stephen Braitman with Allen Ginsberg and his father, Louis Ginsberg, in 1974. The interview is included in First Thought, a collection of conversations with Allen Ginsberg that was edited by Michael Schumacher and published this month by the University of Minnesota Press. Louis Ginsberg was a poet and often participated in joint readings with his son.

stephen braitman: How do you feel about these father-and-son readings?

allen ginsberg: It’s just the inevitable mess of reality. Whatever harmony there is, is real; whatever difference there is, is real.

louis ginsberg: We practice peaceful poetic coexistence.

braitman: What sort of response have you had?

louis: In general, I’d say the young cluster around Allen, while the mature cluster around me.

braitman: We were talking earlier about the risks involved in your poetry. Your poetry so often is politically oriented — almost a call to action.

allen: Not quite. My poetry is primarily a record of my consciousness. The basic principle relies on spontaneous and non-revised transcription of thought-forms.

braitman: Non-revised?

allen: For the most part. They’re touched up here and there, but the basic principle is to catch the bird on the wing rather than to construct an artifact.

louis: But the point it —

allen: Uh, I’m just trying —

louis: Well, go ahead.

allen: I was just trying to answer your question.

louis: Very good, very good. Go ahead, go ahead.

allen: I wasn’t trying to get into a polemic about what type or another —

louis: Oh, far be it from me to —

allen: I want to avoid it, right now. I wanted to answer his question.

louis: I thought the gentleman was soliciting my response.

allen: I want to answer his question.

louis: Very good, I’ll give you time.

allen: I want to answer his question . . . I only want to answer his question.

louis: You see —

allen: I only want to answer his question. So, since political activity is a part of the contents of my mind, it inevitably enters into the poetry.

louis: But at the same time you arouse indignation among people who are sleepy and sluggish. To them it is a call to action to say, “Why should this injustice exist? Let’s do something about it!”

allen: But that’s concomitant potential, rather than the intention.

louis: That may be, that may be.

allen: It is really important to make that distinction.

louis: I am aware, too, of injustices, though not as much as Allen. He’s younger and pays attention to them more.

allen: You lived a more sheltered life.

louis: In my day, we didn’t have this turbulence, this domestic intolerance. While I say what Allen is doing is wonderful and noble, still, that’s one part of life. Who’s to say that life is only this.

allen: The only thing that I know of life or can possibly know of life is what I know of life. I couldn’t know of life what I don’t know of life. That right? That right?

louis: The poet is a voice for the voiceless. He can articulate what many people can’t express.

allen: You’re going to mislead people if you say that. The poet is a voice for his own thoughts.

louis: Nevertheless —

allen: If he starts out intending to be a voice for other people, he will synthesize what he thinks other people should —

louis: I differ from you, if I am true —

allen: There’s a tendency —

louis: If I am true —

allen: There’s a tendency —

louis: Allen feels that anything that wells up in the subconscious is okay in art.

allen: I don’t feel that way.

louis: He says, “Catch it on the wing.”

allen: I only publish a fiftieth of what I write. Your formulation of “anything that wells up from the unconscious” is incorrect.

louis: But the fact remains that you think anything that wells up in the unconscious is poetry.

allen: One moment. Here is all the writing of the last year, 117 pages, of which I have published only five.

louis: Then you do practice conscious revision.

allen: No, I select what is most concrete. And hot.

louis: Is anything you publish consciously scrutinized and selected?

allen: I write a lot of crap. But once I write it down, I don’t revise it. I don’t go back and do it over again.

louis: But you omit certain things.

allen: I omit 98 percent of the things I scribble.

louis: I call that selection.

allen: That’s selection but not revision. I’m just using words precisely, as a poet should.

louis: Do you ever decide this verb is weak, that you need a more vivid, alive, palpitating word?

allen: Occasionally, very rarely.

louis: That’s revision!

allen: Occasionally, very rarely.

louis: That’s revision.

allen: I think you’re being unfair to me.

louis: That may be, but —

allen: In fact, you’re misquoting me. I think it’s unfair for you to misquote me.

louis: Well, I’m giving you —

allen: You said “everything” and I said “maybe five percent.” You’re misquoting me now, and it’s not fair. It’s just not fair!

braitman: What do you feel when you read each other’s poetry?

allen: When I read my father’s poetry, very often there is a tremendous melancholy awareness, an almost tearful realization, that I should have been kinder when we were together.

louis: I’m proud, of course, that he’s fulfilling his nature, that he’s successful and has fame and fortune. But in the end it’s complementary — he sees things, I see things a different way.


More from

| View All Issues |

April 2015

Close
“An unexpectedly excellent magazine that stands out amid a homogenized media landscape.” —the New York Times
Subscribe now

Debug