Washington Babylon — May 15, 2007, 6:55 pm

Donor Scorecard: Tom Loeffler

Senator John McCain raised a paltry, humiliating $13 million during the first quarter of this year—placing him far behind Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani in the race to buy the presidency. So what’s a campaign-finance-reformer to do? Flip-flop. McCain is now counting on intensified support from big contributors to George W. Bush’s two presidential campaigns, many of whom he railed against during his heady period as a campaign finance reformer in years gone by.

Sixty former Bush Rangers or Pioneers raised money for McCain during the first quarter (versus about thirty each for Romney and Giuliani), and last month he appointed one of them, Tom Loeffler, to take over his fundraising operation.

Loeffler is a former member of Congress from Texas who retired in 1986. According to a 1984 study by Public Citizen, he compiled the worst record of any member on consumer issues, and also made news as the top recipient of illegal contributions from Vernon Savings & Loan, which went belly-up at a cost to taxpayers of $1.3 billion. But Loeffler’s finest moment during his years on the Hill came during a mid-1980s trip to San Francisco, when he reportedly called the front desk at his hotel and asked to have extra shower caps brought up to wear on his feet, in order to protect against the AIDS virus.

After retiring, Loeffler became a lobbyist and soon was embroiled in several scandals that marked Bush’s Texas gubernatorial tenure. One came after Bush appointed him to the University of Texas System Board of Regents, where he give the startup firm Introgen Therapeutics the exclusive right to license a gene cancer therapy that had been developed at the university. Several years later, the drug firm named Loeffler to its board and gave him 10,000 shares of stock. Introgen is a current lobbying client for The Loeffler Group, as is Toyota, Qualcomm, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, and Saudi Arabia. Overall, the firm took in $4.6 million in lobbying fees last year.

Loeffler should be of great help to McCain in drumming up campaign money. He’s previously held top fundraising posts for presidential campaigns mounted by former Texas senator Phil Gramm and Bob Dole, and in 2004 was co-chairman of the Republican National Committee’s Team 100 as well as a Bush Super-Ranger, a title given to those who raised more than $300,000.

A recent Houston Chronicle story says Loeffler has decided to use the Bush money model for McCain, “setting dollar targets for the bundlers and creating a McCain 100 and McCain 200 team for those who raised $100,000 and $200,00, respectively.” Other big Bush donors now in McCain’s camp include James B. Lee, Jr., vice chairman of JP Morgan Chase; Donald Bren, chairman of the board of directors of The Irvine Company and the 104th richest person in the world according to Forbes; and A. Jerrold Perenchio, the controlling shareholder of Univision Communications. The latter is a major donor to tax-exempt 527 groups that flourish because they exploit loopholes in the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform bill. In 2005,
according to the Washington Post, McCain “went to court to try to curtail the influence of a group to which [Perenchio] gave $9 million, saying it was trying to ‘evade and violate’ new campaign laws with voter ads ahead of the midterm elections.”

Things change. “Over the years, I have become close friends with each of these distinguished men,” McCain said last December when announcing that Loeffler, Lee, and so on would become major fundraisers for his campaign. “I am honored to have their support as we move forward. Their dedication to the Republican Party and their renowned financial savvy are essential to any successful campaign, and I am so grateful that they have chosen to bring their talents and wisdom to our team.”

It definitely seems that McCain has inherited the Bush donor machine–but his continued support for Bush’s unpopular failure in Iraq will complicate his effort to win the presidency no matter how much money he raises.

Share
Single Page

More from Ken Silverstein:

Commentary November 17, 2015, 6:41 pm

Shaky Foundations

The Clintons’ so-called charitable enterprise has served as a vehicle to launder money and to enrich family friends.

From the November 2013 issue

Dirty South

The foul legacy of Louisiana oil

Perspective October 23, 2013, 8:00 am

On Brining and Dining

How pro-oil Louisiana politicians have shaped American environmental policy

Get access to 165 years of
Harper’s for only $45.99

United States Canada

CATEGORIES

THE CURRENT ISSUE

June 2016

The Improbability Party

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Trump’s People

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

The Old Man

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

The Long Rescue

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

New Television

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

view Table Content

FEATURED ON HARPERS.ORG

Post
Helen Ouyang on the cost of crowd-sourcing drugs, Paul Wood on Trump's supporters, Walter Kirn on political predictions, Sonia Faleiro on a man's search for his kidnapped children, and Rivka Galchen on The People v. O. J. Simpson.

The new docudrama The People v. O. J. Simpson: American Crime Story (FX) isn’t really about Orenthal James Simpson. It’s about the trials that ran alongside his — those informal, unboundaried, court-of-public-opinion trials in which evidence was heard for and against the murder victims, the defense and the prosecution, the judge, the jury, and the Los Angeles Police Department, to say nothing of white and black America. History has freed us from suspense about Simpson’s verdict, so that the man himself (played here by Cuba Gooding Jr.) is less the tragic hero he seemed in the mid-Nineties than a curiously minor character. He comes to the center of our attention only once, in Episode 2, at the end of the lengthy Ford Bronco chase scene — which in real life was followed by a surreal cavalcade of police cars and media helicopters, as well as an estimated 95 million live viewers — when Simpson repeatedly, and with apparent sincerity, apologizes for taking up so much of so many people’s time. It is an uncannily ordinary moment of social decorum, a sort of could-you-please-pass-the-salt gesture on a sinking Titanic, in which Simpson briefly becomes more than just an archetype.

Photograph (detail) © Eve Arnold/Magnum Photos
Article
Trump’s People·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

"All our friends are saying, load up with plenty of ammunition, because after the stores don’t have no food they’re gonna be hitting houses. They’re going to take over America, put their flag on the Capitol.” “Who?” I asked. “ISIS. Oh yeah.”
Photograph by Mark Abramson for Harper's Magazine (detail)
Article
The Long Rescue·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

He made them groom and feed the half-dozen horses used to transport the raw bricks to the furnace. Like the horses, the children were beaten with whips.
Photograph (detail) © Narendra Shrestha/EPA/Newscom
Article
The Old Man·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

The new docudrama The People v. O. J. Simpson: American Crime Story (FX) isn’t really about Orenthal James Simpson. It’s about the trials that ran alongside his — those informal, unboundaried, court-of-public-opinion trials in which evidence was heard for and against the murder victims, the defense and the prosecution, the judge, the jury, and the Los Angeles Police Department, to say nothing of white and black America. History has freed us from suspense about Simpson’s verdict, so that the man himself (played here by Cuba Gooding Jr.) is less the tragic hero he seemed in the mid-Nineties than a curiously minor character. He comes to the center of our attention only once, in Episode 2, at the end of the lengthy Ford Bronco chase scene — which in real life was followed by a surreal cavalcade of police cars and media helicopters, as well as an estimated 95 million live viewers — when Simpson repeatedly, and with apparent sincerity, apologizes for taking up so much of so many people’s time. It is an uncannily ordinary moment of social decorum, a sort of could-you-please-pass-the-salt gesture on a sinking Titanic, in which Simpson briefly becomes more than just an archetype.

Illustration (detail) by Jen Renninger
Article
New Television·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

With its lens shifting from the courtroom to the newsroom to people’s back yards, the series evokes the way in which, for a brief, delusory moment, the O. J. verdict seemed to deliver justice for all black men.
Still from The People vs. OJ Simpson: American Crime Story © FX Networks

Amount an auditor estimated last year that Oregon could save each year by feeding prisoners less food:

$62,000

Kentucky is the saddest state.

An Italian economist was questioned on suspicion of terrorism after a fellow passenger on an American Airlines flight witnessed him writing differential equations on a pad of paper.

Subscribe to the Weekly Review newsletter. Don’t worry, we won’t sell your email address!

HARPER’S FINEST

Mississippi Drift

By

Matt was happy enough to sustain himself on the detritus of a world he saw as careening toward self-destruction, and equally happy to scam a government he despised. 'I’m glad everyone’s so wasteful,' he told me. 'It supports my lifestyle.'

Subscribe Today