SIGN IN to access Harper’s Magazine
1. Sign in to Customer Care using your account number or postal address.
2. Select Email/Password Information.
3. Enter your new information and click on Save My Changes.
Subscribers can find additional help here. Not a subscriber? Subscribe today!
Just a short while ago, Dick Cheney went to the Middle East. He appeared on the deck of a U.S. aircraft carrier in the Persian Gulf and delivered an incendiary speech, designed to provoke the Iranians into acts of hostility. We learned that when Condoleezza Rice proposed releasing the five Iranians who had traveled to Arbil, Iraq, at the invitation of Iraqi government officials, to set up a consulate–and then were seized by U.S. Forces, Dick Cheney shot the idea down. He apparently reasoned, “If they could hold our diplomats hostage, we can hold theirs.” Cheney also advocated the use of military means to free the fifteen British sailors and marines seized about two months ago by the Iranians–a move that most likely would have led to their deaths. To this the British replied, “No thanks.”
And this evening, ABC News reports that Cheney has been busily advocating unspecified military steps against the Iranians now.
The sources, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the subject, say President Bush has signed a “nonlethal presidential finding” that puts into motion a CIA plan that reportedly includes a coordinated campaign of propaganda, disinformation and manipulation of Iran’s currency and international financial transactions . . .
“Vice President Cheney helped to lead the side favoring a military strike,” said former CIA official Riedel, “but I think they have come to the conclusion that a military strike has more downsides than upsides.” The covert action plan comes as U.S. officials have confirmed Iran had dramatically increased its ability to produce nuclear weapons material, at a pace that experts said would give them the ability to build a nuclear bomb in two years.
So no military action for the moment, but a covert proxy war is already underway. These things have the habit of building into ever heavier levels in the sort of cycle that Barbara Tuchman described in The Guns of August.
Neither the Iranian people nor the American people want these juvenile antics. Both of us suffer under governments of delusional, dangerous men. We’ll be doing well at this point simply to survive the next two years.
More from Scott Horton:
Six Questions — October 18, 2014, 8:00 pm
Nathaniel Raymond on CIA interrogation techniques.
I recently spent a semester teaching writing at an elite liberal-arts college. At strategic points around the campus, in shades of yellow and green, banners displayed the following pair of texts. The first was attributed to the college’s founder, which dates it to the 1920s. The second was extracted from the latest version of the institution’s mission statement:
The paramount obligation of a college is to develop in its students the ability to think clearly and independently, and the ability to live confidently, courageously, and hopefully.
Let us take a moment to compare these texts. The first thing to observe about the older one is that it is a sentence. It expresses an idea by placing concepts in relation to one another within the kind of structure that we call a syntax. It is, moreover, highly wrought: a parallel structure underscored by repetition, five adverbs balanced two against three.
Percentage of Britons who cannot name the city that provides the setting for the musical Chicago:
An Australian entrepreneur was selling oysters raised in tanks laced with Viagra.
A naked man believed to be under the influence of LSD rammed his pickup truck into two police cars.
Subscribe to the Weekly Review newsletter. Don’t worry, we won’t sell your email address!
“Shelby is waiting for something. He himself does not know what it is. When it comes he will either go back into the world from which he came, or sink out of sight in the morass of alcoholism or despair that has engulfed other vagrants.”