SIGN IN to access Harper’s Magazine
1. Sign in to Customer Care using your account number or postal address.
2. Select Email/Password Information.
3. Enter your new information and click on Save My Changes.
Subscribers can find additional help here. Not a subscriber? Subscribe today!
In his first inaugural address, Thomas Jefferson made the focal role of the writ of habeas corpus clear. Among those principles which “form the bright constellation which has gone before us and guided our steps through an age of revolution and reformation,” habeas corpus played the lead role. It was not a musty lawyer’s tool. It was the constitutional pillar upon which all the other rights rest–for without it no person could be assured that the rights conferred by the Constitution would have any meaning. Habeas corpus is what separated the American constitutional tradition from that of so many other nations around the world. They had beautiful constitutions ensuring every sort of civil liberty. But without a tool to enforce those rights, they were meaningless.
The last Congress was rightly viewed by the American public as one of the most corrupt in our nation’s history. It was corrupt due both to the venality of so many of its members, and its betrayal of fundamental values. The greatest single act of betrayal was the decision to suspend the writ of habeas corpus taken at the end of 2006 in the Military Commissions Act. It was, as the editors of the New York Times write, “one of the worst laws in the nation’s history.”
In 2006, Democrats achieved stunning success in the midterm elections campaigning on a promise to reverse the worst excesses of the Bush administration’s assault on the Constitution. But having achieved majorities in both houses, having assumed leadership, they have demonstrated shameful spinelessness on this issue–fretting endlessly over the “timing” and “framing” of a simple act of striking out the provisions that strip habeas corpus and restore the status quo ante. The Republicans (who without a doubt as the true villains of this story) constantly accuse the Democrats of a lack of resolve and fortitude. And on this count, the charge sticks. This issue is deadly serious and it merits being pushed with every tool in the majority’s disposal. In particular, it should be attached to defense appropriations and left there–as a pill that President Bush must swallow if he wants funding for his unpopular war in Iraq.
The proposal that is now being promoted–putting the issue up for a stand-alone vote–is a meaningless gesture and an insult to those who took the Democrats at their word. Habeas corpus is our heritage. It’s what Americans have fought and died to defend from our Revolution forward. And it’s high time that the Democrats whatever remain of the real Republicans stand up for it.
More from Scott Horton:
Six Questions — October 18, 2014, 8:00 pm
Nathaniel Raymond on CIA interrogation techniques.
Mark Denbeaux on the NCIS cover-up of three “suicides” at Guantánamo Bay Detention Camp
Chance that an American would give up at least one week of life to avoid taking a pill every day:
Iowa urologists reported that only a minor portion of locker-room teasing arises from “the presence of excess foreskin”; most teasing targets small penises.
A pair of Russian film directors asked President Vladimir Putin to invest $18 million in a new restaurant chain intended to drive McDonald’s out of the Russian market. “Every project these days,” a Russian television personality said of the proposal, “must be smothered in patriotic sauce.”
Subscribe to the Weekly Review newsletter. Don’t worry, we won’t sell your email address!
“Shelby is waiting for something. He himself does not know what it is. When it comes he will either go back into the world from which he came, or sink out of sight in the morass of alcoholism or despair that has engulfed other vagrants.”