SIGN IN to access Harper’s Magazine
1. Sign in to Customer Care using your account number or postal address.
2. Select Email/Password Information.
3. Enter your new information and click on Save My Changes.
Subscribers can find additional help here. Not a subscriber? Subscribe today!
I just finished reading the Jeff Gerth-Don Van Natta book on Hillary Clinton entitled Her Way and relived the tumultuous days of the Whitewater investigation through it. One thing that really struck me was the hyperventilation in the media at that time, while public attitudes remained relatively calm. It seems just the flip side of the current situation in which scandals have proliferated beyond count, the public is intensely unhappy, but the media has a sort of ho-hum, “scandal, what scandal?” attitude. Certainly some would see a partisan orientation on the part of mainstream media, emerging from this juxtaposition. A good example turns on the use of the word “liar.” William Safire, for instance, launched a firestorm in the media on January 26, 1996 by penning a New York Times column in which he called Hillary a “congenital liar.” Safire cited a series of evasive statements Hillary made concerning a stock investment, her role in the firing of a travel agent, and the disappearance of her billing records. The First Lady’s billing records had turned up after being missing for a year, and those records showed that Hillary had logged 60 hours of work on Whitewater-related matters over a two-year period. Hillary said her work on the matter had been “insignificant.” With ten years distance, Hillary’s conduct looks evasive and unprofessional, but the matters covered in the end turned out to be trivial. Whitewater was all smoke and no fire, and Safire’s comments wind up looking like partisan hyperventilation. In an age in which corporate lawyers routinely bill 2200 or 2400 hours a year, and more, 60 hours over two years would certainly be viewed by many as “insignificant.”
Conversely, we look at prevarications that come out of the Bush Administration – which go to things of vastly greater consequence to society – for instance, the use of torture, the approval of illegal surveillance schemes, the partisan dismissal, appointment and manipulation of prosecutors. But these rarely seem to provoke comment, and indeed we have the immortal comment of the New York Times’s Elisabeth Bumiller that “you can’t just say the president’s lying.” The Bumiller mentality is widespread with the Washington press corps, and to the extent the nation is now drowning in lies of an Orwellian magnitude, this is a major reason.
If there is a media source which has been keeping watch and flagging these lies, it’s Jon Stewart at the Daily Show and Stephen Colbert and the Colbert Report. They approach the issue with a tone of ridicule that is completely appropriate to the topic. And one of the best examples appeared last night, when, through the magic of television, Tony Snow was allowed to confront Tony Snow in a brazen lie about the U.S. attorney’s scandal. This is a must-watch video. But best to tune into Comedy Central Monday night (6/18/07) and watch the show on its rebroadcast.
More from Scott Horton:
Conversation — August 5, 2016, 12:08 pm
Sidney Blumenthal on the origins of the Republican Party, the fallout from Clinton’s emails, and his new biography of Abraham Lincoln
Conversation — March 30, 2016, 3:44 pm
Joseph Hickman discusses his new book, The Burn Pits, which tells the story of thousands of U.S. soldiers who, after returning from Iraq and Afghanistan, have developed rare cancers and respiratory diseases.
Minutes after a tornado hit Shiloh, Illinois, in April that the town’s warning siren sounded:
A bowl of 4,000-year-old noodles was found in northwestern China; and a spokesman for the Chinese Academy of Sciences said that “this is the earliest empirical evidence of noodles ever found.”
Rodrigo Duterte, the president of the Philippines, announced that he has ordered the country’s navy and coast guard to bomb the ships of kidnappers even if civilian hostages are on board.
Subscribe to the Weekly Review newsletter. Don’t worry, we won’t sell your email address!
"It is an interesting and somewhat macabre parlor game to play at a large gathering of one’s acquaintances: to speculate who in a showdown would go Nazi. By now, I think I know. I have gone through the experience many times—in Germany, in Austria, and in France. I have come to know the types: the born Nazis, the Nazis whom democracy itself has created, the certain-to-be fellow-travelers. And I also know those who never, under any conceivable circumstances, would become Nazis."