No Comment — July 24, 2007, 10:51 am

Gonzales Speaks (Close-Captioned for the Politically Impaired)

I’m sitting in a bar in Edinburgh, Scotland, and guess what people are watching? Alberto Gonzales testifying. (Many rude comments in the background. Even watching “Trainspotting” did not prepare me for the local accent however–I can’t really figure what they’re saying. But rude it is for sure.) I am expecting the channels to be switched shortly for some golf matches, but for the moment, Gonzo is the man.

It’s already been an interesting morning, what with the chair saying point-blank “I don’t trust you,” and the ranking member (the Republican who should be supporting Gonzales) demanding that he appoint a special prosecutor to investigate himself. But here are some snippets from Gonzo’s opening statement, with annotations, once more Schnitzler-style (Gonzo’s spoken words in Roman, and what Gonzo’s really thinking in italics):

I believe very strongly that there is no place for political considerations in the hiring of our career employees or in the administration of justice. [That’s why I told the Chicago Tribune that I was planning to proceed full speed ahead with the politicization by arranging for regular meetings between federal prosecutors and GOP political figures. When we do it, it’s called “implementing policies.” If the Democrats do it, it’s called politics. See, isn’t that simple?] As such, the allegations of such activity have been troubling to hear. [Bush’s approval in the lower twenties. Very troubling to hear. But not to worry: we don’t have to seek re-election.] From my perspective, there are two options available in light of these allegations. I could walk away or I could devote my time, effort and energy to fix the problems. Since I have never been one to quit, I decided that the best course of action was to remain here and fix the problems. That is exactly what I am doing. [Of course the other option would be for me to prosecute myself since I am responsible for the political manipulations. Like hell am I going to do that. Moreover, if and when I quit, my successor probably will appoint a prosecutor, who probably will prosecute me. So I’m here for life, or until Bush leaves Washington, whichever happens later.] . . .

I am very proud of the results that the Department of Justice has achieved. [We succeeded in prosecuting seven Democrats for every Republican, and we got away with it for six years before those idiot Democrats figured out what we were doing. I’d say that’s quite an accomplishment.] As the testimony above demonstrates, the Department’s employees continue to work day in and day out to protect Americans. That said, reinforcing public confidence in the Department is also critical and will be one of my top priorities as Attorney General for the remainder of my term. I know that this Committee shares this concern, and I would like now to address briefly one issue in particular.
I believe very strongly that there is no place for political considerations in the hiring of our career employees or in the administration of justice. [Remember, President Bush is entitled to have good team players to implement his policies. That’s not politics. However, Democrats engage in politics. Therefore, we are serving the nation’s interests when we carefully identify Democrats and exclude them. As well as disloyal Republicans, like people who previously voted for John McCain. They’re even more devious traitors because they pass for Republicans.] As such, the allegations of such activity have been troubling to hear. From my perspective, there are two options available in light of these allegations. I could walk away or I could devote my time, effort and energy to fix the problems. Since I have never been one to quit, I decided that the best course of action was to remain here and fix the problems. That is exactly what I am doing. [The seventeen months we have remaining is enough to completely purge disloyal staffers from the department. We expect to keep to schedule.]

As you know, upon learning of these troubling accusations, we promptly referred these matters to the Office of Professional Responsibility and Office of the Inspector General. [That, of course, is a complete lie. We did nothing. In fact, I wrote an op-ed for USA Today in which I decried all of this as a petty employment matter. Things went to OPR only when this was sustained in the headlines for over a month and it was clear it wouldn’t blow over when I doled out a bunch of lies and then sent the other two most senior people at DOJ to tell more lies. But not to worry, OPR is right here in my vest pocket.] This was the right course of action for the Department and I have complete faith and confidence that their investigations will be thorough, comprehensive, and, ultimately, very helpful in rooting out and addressing any mistakes that occurred on my watch.

But I am not going to wait for the results of these investigations to begin taking steps to ensure that any previous mistakes are not repeated. I have appointed experienced personnel [political loyalty certified], revised certain policies and procedures [particularly in order to bolster our efforts to stonewall all investigations and to assure the White House that Executive Privilege trumps the Constitution and all inferior laws], and have communicated to the Department leadership that I will not tolerate any improper politicization of this Department [again, that means Democratic politics; implementation of the White House’s policy agenda is not politics, it is what we are sworn to do. After all, we serve to pleasure the president, and his chief political advisor]. I will continue to make efforts to ensure that my staff and others within the Department have the appropriate experience and judgment so that previous mistakes will not be repeated [we will do everything in our power to block you from questioning witnesses and reviewing internal DOJ documents which disclose our misdeeds]. And I will continue to ensure that the Department attracts and hires highly qualified individuals from the broadest base possible without reference to their political affiliations [in addition to Regent University and Liberty University, we will now also recruit from Bob Jones, St Thomas Moore and Ave Maria University.]

The Department’s work is critical. In order to continue to serve the American public well, we need to reinforce public confidence and to attract and retain the best possible employees. We are working to ensure that this happens. [By staying on another seventeen months or so, we hope to drive from the DOJ most senior qualified professionals, so we can complete the process of appointing our political hacks to every nook and cranny in the department.]

Share
Single Page

More from Scott Horton:

Context, No Comment August 28, 2015, 12:16 pm

Beltway Secrecy

In five easy lessons

From the April 2015 issue

Company Men

Torture, treachery, and the CIA

Six Questions October 18, 2014, 8:00 pm

The APA Grapples with Its Torture Demons: Six Questions for Nathaniel Raymond

Nathaniel Raymond on CIA interrogation techniques.

Get access to 165 years of
Harper’s for only $45.99

United States Canada

CATEGORIES

THE CURRENT ISSUE

September 2015

Weed Whackers

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Tremendous Machine

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

A Goose in a Dress

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

The Genealogy of Orals

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

view Table Content

FEATURED ON HARPERS.ORG

Article
Romancing Kano·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

I recently spent a semester teaching writing at an elite liberal-arts college. At strategic points around the campus, in shades of yellow and green, banners displayed the following pair of texts. The first was attributed to the college’s founder, which dates it to the 1920s. The second was extracted from the latest version of the institution’s mission statement:

The paramount obligation of a college is to develop in its students the ability to think clearly and independently, and the ability to live confidently, courageously, and hopefully.

leadership
service
integrity
creativity

Let us take a moment to compare these texts. The first thing to observe about the older one is that it is a sentence. It expresses an idea by placing concepts in relation to one another within the kind of structure that we call a syntax. It is, moreover, highly wrought: a parallel structure underscored by repetition, five adverbs balanced two against three.

Article
The Prisoner of Sex·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

“It is disappointing that parts of Purity read as though Franzen urgently wanted to telegraph a message to anyone who would defend his fiction from charges of chauvinism: ‘No, you’ve got me wrong. I really am sexist.’”
Illustration by Shonagh Rae
Article
Gangs of Karachi·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

“In Karachi, sometimes only the thinnest of polite fictions separates the politicians from the men who kill and extort on their behalf.”
Photograph © Asim Rafiqui/NOOR Images
Article
Weed Whackers·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

“Defining 'native' and 'invasive' in an ever-shifting natural world poses some problems. The camel, after all, is native to North America, though it went extinct here 8,000 years ago, while the sacrosanct redwood tree is invasive, having snuck in at some point in the past 65 million years.”
Photograph by Chad Ress
Article
The Neoliberal Arts·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

“College is seldom about thinking or learning anymore. Everyone is running around trying to figure out what it is about. So far, they have come up with buzzwords, mainly those three.”
Artwork by Julie Cockburn

Percentage of Britons who cannot name the city that provides the setting for the musical Chicago:

65

An Australian entrepreneur was selling oysters raised in tanks laced with Viagra.

A naked man believed to be under the influence of LSD rammed his pickup truck into two police cars.

Subscribe to the Weekly Review newsletter. Don’t worry, we won’t sell your email address!

HARPER’S FINEST

Subways Are for Sleeping

By

“Shelby is waiting for something. He himself does not know what it is. When it comes he will either go back into the world from which he came, or sink out of sight in the morass of alcoholism or despair that has engulfed other vagrants.”

Subscribe Today