SIGN IN to access Harper’s Magazine
Need to create a login? Want to change your email address or password? Forgot your password?
1. Sign in to Customer Care using your account number or postal address.
2. Select Email/Password Information.
3. Enter your new information and click on Save My Changes.
Subscribers can find additional help here. Not a subscriber? Subscribe today!
Today, the Government of Russia has resigned, so President Putin will be appointing a new prime minister and cabinet shortly. Vedomosti, perhaps the most sober assessor of political news in the Moscow press, reports this morning that First Deputy Prime Minister Sergei Ivanov will emerge as the new prime minister, and thus also the inside candidate to succeed Putin as president. In any event, the appointment of the new prime minister will mark the construction of the first span of the bridge to the post-Putin presidency—a significant and long-awaited event. As I noted in my recent speech in Tbilisi on emerging U.S.-Russian relations, there is a distinct chill in the air and the prospects for further deterioration in the relationship are numerous.
The world has had a roughly 15-year respite from the arms race that consumed so much of its resources for a period of two human generations following the events of 1939. Many have viewed the United States-Russian arms race as a relic of the past. But that may soon turn out to be wishful thinking. Those in the Kremlin who seek to restore the grandeur and power of the Russian state see arms technology as an essential aspect of this struggle. And while Russian technological strength has not been put to much effective use on the commercial side, its military aspect has always been impressive. So today’s announcement, carried on Reuters, of a new warhead should perhaps come as no shock:
Russia has tested the world’s most powerful vacuum bomb, which unleashes a destructive shockwave with the power of a nuclear blast, the military said on Tuesday, dubbing it the “father of all bombs.” The bomb is the latest in a series of new Russian weapons and policy moves as President Vladimir Putin tries to reassert Moscow’s role on the international stage.
“Test results of the new airborne weapon have shown that its efficiency and power is commensurate with a nuclear weapon,” Alexander Rukshin, Russian deputy armed forces chief of staff, told Russia’s state ORT First Channel television. The same report was later shown on the state-sponsored Vesti channel. “You will now see it in action, the bomb which has no match in the world is being tested at a military site.”
An arms race like the one that marked the first decades of my life is not yet underway, nor is it imminent. But the prospect of such a development sits before us, much clearer than at any time in the last decade. It is the product of human vanity and foolishness—the product of a thirst for prestige and power surmounting reason. And the blame for these developments lies at least as much in Washington, D.C., which has exercised no measure of self-restraint and has surrendered to calls for juvenile military adventurism, as has happened in the Kremlin.
More from Scott Horton:
Conversation — August 5, 2016, 12:08 pm
Sidney Blumenthal on the origins of the Republican Party, the fallout from Clinton’s emails, and his new biography of Abraham Lincoln
Conversation — March 30, 2016, 3:44 pm
Joseph Hickman discusses his new book, The Burn Pits, which tells the story of thousands of U.S. soldiers who, after returning from Iraq and Afghanistan, have developed rare cancers and respiratory diseases.
Number of tombstones in Tombstone, Arizona:
Electrofishing on the Irrawaddy River deters dolphins from their habit of assisting fishermen.
Trump tweeted that “millions of people” had illegally cast ballots in last month’s presidential election, and the Washington Post identified four cases of voter fraud across the country.
Subscribe to the Weekly Review newsletter. Don’t worry, we won’t sell your email address!
"It is an interesting and somewhat macabre parlor game to play at a large gathering of one’s acquaintances: to speculate who in a showdown would go Nazi. By now, I think I know. I have gone through the experience many times—in Germany, in Austria, and in France. I have come to know the types: the born Nazis, the Nazis whom democracy itself has created, the certain-to-be fellow-travelers. And I also know those who never, under any conceivable circumstances, would become Nazis."