SIGN IN to access Harper’s Magazine
1. Sign in to Customer Care using your account number or postal address.
2. Select Email/Password Information.
3. Enter your new information and click on Save My Changes.
Subscribers can find additional help here. Not a subscriber? Subscribe today!
Today, the Government of Russia has resigned, so President Putin will be appointing a new prime minister and cabinet shortly. Vedomosti, perhaps the most sober assessor of political news in the Moscow press, reports this morning that First Deputy Prime Minister Sergei Ivanov will emerge as the new prime minister, and thus also the inside candidate to succeed Putin as president. In any event, the appointment of the new prime minister will mark the construction of the first span of the bridge to the post-Putin presidency—a significant and long-awaited event. As I noted in my recent speech in Tbilisi on emerging U.S.-Russian relations, there is a distinct chill in the air and the prospects for further deterioration in the relationship are numerous.
The world has had a roughly 15-year respite from the arms race that consumed so much of its resources for a period of two human generations following the events of 1939. Many have viewed the United States-Russian arms race as a relic of the past. But that may soon turn out to be wishful thinking. Those in the Kremlin who seek to restore the grandeur and power of the Russian state see arms technology as an essential aspect of this struggle. And while Russian technological strength has not been put to much effective use on the commercial side, its military aspect has always been impressive. So today’s announcement, carried on Reuters, of a new warhead should perhaps come as no shock:
Russia has tested the world’s most powerful vacuum bomb, which unleashes a destructive shockwave with the power of a nuclear blast, the military said on Tuesday, dubbing it the “father of all bombs.” The bomb is the latest in a series of new Russian weapons and policy moves as President Vladimir Putin tries to reassert Moscow’s role on the international stage.
“Test results of the new airborne weapon have shown that its efficiency and power is commensurate with a nuclear weapon,” Alexander Rukshin, Russian deputy armed forces chief of staff, told Russia’s state ORT First Channel television. The same report was later shown on the state-sponsored Vesti channel. “You will now see it in action, the bomb which has no match in the world is being tested at a military site.”
An arms race like the one that marked the first decades of my life is not yet underway, nor is it imminent. But the prospect of such a development sits before us, much clearer than at any time in the last decade. It is the product of human vanity and foolishness—the product of a thirst for prestige and power surmounting reason. And the blame for these developments lies at least as much in Washington, D.C., which has exercised no measure of self-restraint and has surrendered to calls for juvenile military adventurism, as has happened in the Kremlin.
More from Scott Horton:
Six Questions — October 18, 2014, 8:00 pm
Nathaniel Raymond on CIA interrogation techniques.
I recently spent a semester teaching writing at an elite liberal-arts college. At strategic points around the campus, in shades of yellow and green, banners displayed the following pair of texts. The first was attributed to the college’s founder, which dates it to the 1920s. The second was extracted from the latest version of the institution’s mission statement:
The paramount obligation of a college is to develop in its students the ability to think clearly and independently, and the ability to live confidently, courageously, and hopefully.
Let us take a moment to compare these texts. The first thing to observe about the older one is that it is a sentence. It expresses an idea by placing concepts in relation to one another within the kind of structure that we call a syntax. It is, moreover, highly wrought: a parallel structure underscored by repetition, five adverbs balanced two against three.
Percentage of Britons who cannot name the city that provides the setting for the musical Chicago:
An Australian entrepreneur was selling oysters raised in tanks laced with Viagra.
A naked man believed to be under the influence of LSD rammed his pickup truck into two police cars.
Subscribe to the Weekly Review newsletter. Don’t worry, we won’t sell your email address!
“Shelby is waiting for something. He himself does not know what it is. When it comes he will either go back into the world from which he came, or sink out of sight in the morass of alcoholism or despair that has engulfed other vagrants.”