SIGN IN to access Harper’s Magazine
1. Sign in to Customer Care using your account number or postal address.
2. Select Email/Password Information.
3. Enter your new information and click on Save My Changes.
Subscribers can find additional help here. Not a subscriber? Subscribe today!
With Fidel Castro giving up power in Cuba, might there be a change in American policy towards Havana, such as scrapping the ancient, spectacularly unsuccessful trade embargo? Probably not as long as Congressman Eliot Engel continues to wield power as chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee’s Subcommittee on the Western Hemisphere
Engel, the generally liberal Democrat from New York, is a member of Congress’s Cuba Democracy Caucus, which seeks the maintenance of a hard-line approach to Cuba, including continued economic sanctions. Members of the caucus “have drawn up lists of lawmakers and their positions on Cuba,” said a story last year in the Miami Herald. “Those who are new to the issue or undecided get a full briefing…Others who have voted against easing sanctions in the past are pulled aside for a brief chat to make sure their position hasn’t changed.”
Engel has also received notable financial support from the US-Cuba Democracy PAC, a pro-embargo group that has been described as “the loudest voice for Cuban exile politics.” During the past five years, the PAC has donated $13,000 to Engel, including $5,000 in the current election cycle. Members and contributors to the PAC have given another $7,550 to Engel since last year.
Engel will be holding a hearing on Cuba policy tomorrow. The witness list, not surprisingly, seems to be heavily tilted towards the conservative side. It includes Susan Kaufman Purcell, director of the Center for Hemispheric Policy at the University of Miami, and Nancy Menges of the Center for Security Policy (the widow of Constantine Menges, a national security aide for Latin America during the Reagan Administration).
Engels’ donors will be pleased, no doubt.
More from Ken Silverstein:
Commentary — November 17, 2015, 6:41 pm
The Clintons’ so-called charitable enterprise has served as a vehicle to launder money and to enrich family friends.
Flor Arely Sánchez had been in bed with a fever and pains throughout her body for three days when a July thunderstorm broke over the mountainside. She got nervous when bolts of light flashed in the sky. Lightning strikes the San Julián region of western El Salvador several times a year, and her neighbors fear storms more than they fear the march of diseases — first dengue, then chikungunya, now Zika. Flor worried about a lot of things, since she was pregnant.
Late in the afternoon, when the pains had somewhat eased, Flor thought she might go to a dammed-up bit of the river near her house to bathe. She is thirty-five and has lived in the same place all her life, where wrinkled hills are planted with corn, beans, and fruit trees. She took a towel and soap and walked out into the rain. Halfway to the river, the pains returned and overcame her. The next thing Flor remembers, she was in a room she didn’t recognize, unable to move. As she soon discovered, she was in a hospital, her ankle cuffed to the bed, and she was being investigated for abortion.
Average duration of a Japanese prime minister’s tenure since August 1993, in months:
Brain shrinkage has no effect on cognition.
An Indianapolis fertility doctor was accused of using his own sperm to artificially inseminate patients, and a Delaware man pleaded guilty to fatally stabbing his former psychiatrist.
Subscribe to the Weekly Review newsletter. Don’t worry, we won’t sell your email address!
“Matt was happy enough to sustain himself on the detritus of a world he saw as careening toward self-destruction, and equally happy to scam a government he despised. 'I’m glad everyone’s so wasteful,' he told me. 'It supports my lifestyle.'”