SIGN IN to access Harper’s Magazine
1. Sign in to Customer Care using your account number or postal address.
2. Select Email/Password Information.
3. Enter your new information and click on Save My Changes.
Subscribers can find additional help here. Not a subscriber? Subscribe today!
With Fidel Castro giving up power in Cuba, might there be a change in American policy towards Havana, such as scrapping the ancient, spectacularly unsuccessful trade embargo? Probably not as long as Congressman Eliot Engel continues to wield power as chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee’s Subcommittee on the Western Hemisphere
Engel, the generally liberal Democrat from New York, is a member of Congress’s Cuba Democracy Caucus, which seeks the maintenance of a hard-line approach to Cuba, including continued economic sanctions. Members of the caucus “have drawn up lists of lawmakers and their positions on Cuba,” said a story last year in the Miami Herald. “Those who are new to the issue or undecided get a full briefing…Others who have voted against easing sanctions in the past are pulled aside for a brief chat to make sure their position hasn’t changed.”
Engel has also received notable financial support from the US-Cuba Democracy PAC, a pro-embargo group that has been described as “the loudest voice for Cuban exile politics.” During the past five years, the PAC has donated $13,000 to Engel, including $5,000 in the current election cycle. Members and contributors to the PAC have given another $7,550 to Engel since last year.
Engel will be holding a hearing on Cuba policy tomorrow. The witness list, not surprisingly, seems to be heavily tilted towards the conservative side. It includes Susan Kaufman Purcell, director of the Center for Hemispheric Policy at the University of Miami, and Nancy Menges of the Center for Security Policy (the widow of Constantine Menges, a national security aide for Latin America during the Reagan Administration).
Engels’ donors will be pleased, no doubt.
More from Ken Silverstein:
Commentary — November 17, 2015, 6:41 pm
The Clintons’ so-called charitable enterprise has served as a vehicle to launder money and to enrich family friends.
Freddie Gray’s relatives arrived for the trial in the afternoon, after the prep-school kids had left. By their dress, they seemed to have just gotten off work in the medical and clerical fields. The family did not appear at ease in the courtroom. They winced and dropped their heads as William Porter and his fellow officer Zachary Novak testified to opening the doors of their police van last April and finding Freddie paralyzed, unresponsive, with mucus pooling at his mouth and nose. Four women and one man mournfully listened as the officers described needing to get gloves before they could touch him.
The first of six Baltimore police officers to be brought before the court for their treatment of Freddie Gray, a black twenty-five-year-old whose death in their custody was the immediate cause of the city’s uprising last spring, William Porter is young, black, and on trial. Here in this courtroom, in this city, in this nation, race and the future seem so intertwined as to be the same thing.
Number of Turkish college students detained in the last year for requesting Kurdish-language classes:
Turkey was funding a search for Suleiman the Magnificent’s heart.
A former prison in Philadelphia that has served as a horror-movie set was being prepared as a detention center for protesters arrested at the upcoming Democratic National Convention, and presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump fired his campaign manager.
Subscribe to the Weekly Review newsletter. Don’t worry, we won’t sell your email address!
“Matt was happy enough to sustain himself on the detritus of a world he saw as careening toward self-destruction, and equally happy to scam a government he despised. 'I’m glad everyone’s so wasteful,' he told me. 'It supports my lifestyle.'”