SIGN IN to access Harper’s Magazine
1. Sign in to Customer Care using your account number or postal address.
2. Select Email/Password Information.
3. Enter your new information and click on Save My Changes.
Subscribers can find additional help here. Not a subscriber? Subscribe today!
In a recent story about Hillary Clinton, I stated that Congressman Charles Rangel had, like Clinton, accepted political contributions from attorney Melvyn Weiss, who recently pleaded guilty to paying kickbacks to people who served as lead plaintiffs in class-action lawsuits that netted his New York law firm hundreds of millions of dollars in fees. I also said, citing a news story, that Rangel had once asked lobbyists to underwrite his birthday party.
Congressman Rangel called me today because he felt the the item did not make clear that the event in question is an annual political fundraiser, not a personal party. Rangel said that for about the past 30 years he has held a political fundraiser for his birthday at New York’s Tavern on the Green restaurant. He said he invites “lobbyists and whomever” (the latter group includes friends, family, politicians, and business leaders) to the event and that most of the money raised goes to support fellow Democrats in Congress. The event is perfectly legal and violates no ethics rules.
Meanwhile, Rangel’s campaign wrote to say that his National Leadership PAC has returned all of the money donated by Mr. Weiss since 2001 and given it to the Boys Choir of Harlem. I regret that error; his PAC’s donations were not reflected in campaign finance reports I consulted.
Readers who wish to review the congressman’s campaign finance records should consult opensecrets.org. According to the site, the five top industries that have traditionally supported Rangel are: insurance, legal services, securities, health care, and real estate. Lobbyists rank as his ninth largest group of career donors, having given him about $428,000.
More from Ken Silverstein:
Perspective — October 23, 2013, 8:00 am
How pro-oil Louisiana politicians have shaped American environmental policy
Postcard — October 16, 2013, 8:00 am
A trip to one of the properties at issue in Louisiana’s oil-pollution lawsuits
I recently spent a semester teaching writing at an elite liberal-arts college. At strategic points around the campus, in shades of yellow and green, banners displayed the following pair of texts. The first was attributed to the college’s founder, which dates it to the 1920s. The second was extracted from the latest version of the institution’s mission statement:
The paramount obligation of a college is to develop in its students the ability to think clearly and independently, and the ability to live confidently, courageously, and hopefully.
Let us take a moment to compare these texts. The first thing to observe about the older one is that it is a sentence. It expresses an idea by placing concepts in relation to one another within the kind of structure that we call a syntax. It is, moreover, highly wrought: a parallel structure underscored by repetition, five adverbs balanced two against three.
Percentage of Britons who cannot name the city that provides the setting for the musical Chicago:
An Australian entrepreneur was selling oysters raised in tanks laced with Viagra.
A naked man believed to be under the influence of LSD rammed his pickup truck into two police cars.
Subscribe to the Weekly Review newsletter. Don’t worry, we won’t sell your email address!
“Shelby is waiting for something. He himself does not know what it is. When it comes he will either go back into the world from which he came, or sink out of sight in the morass of alcoholism or despair that has engulfed other vagrants.”