SIGN IN to access Harper’s Magazine
Need to create a login? Want to change your email address or password? Forgot your password?
1. Sign in to Customer Care using your account number or postal address.
2. Select Email/Password Information.
3. Enter your new information and click on Save My Changes.
Subscribers can find additional help here. Not a subscriber? Subscribe today!
“President Obama called on world leaders to come to an agreement on climate change, no matter how imperfect,” the New York Times reported today.
The Times also said that Obama “pressed for an accord that would monitor whether countries — primarily China — are complying with promised emissions cuts.” Dean Baker made a good point that should be kept in mind when reading all of the analysis from the climate summit, and about America’s noble effort to save the planet:
The current view in the U.S. appears to be that the Chinese should forever commit themselves to emitting greenhouse gases at one-third or one-quarter the per capita rate as people in the United States.
“Our rationale is apparently that we started polluting the planet first; therefore, we get some sort of squatters’ rights in the deal. Needless to say, the Chinese are not impressed by this logic. If the U.S. were in a position to impose its will in this matter on China, then it wouldn’t matter that our negotiating position makes no sense. But we aren’t.
“If we want an agreement, then we will have to depart in a very fundamental way from the current position. We do need China to restrict its greenhouse gas emissions, but we will need to compensate it for this.
Gee, that sounds familiar.
More from Ken Silverstein:
Commentary — November 17, 2015, 6:41 pm
The Clintons’ so-called charitable enterprise has served as a vehicle to launder money and to enrich family friends.
Chances that a Soviet woman’s first pregnancy will end in abortion:
Peaceful fungus-farming ants are sometimes protected against nomadic raider ants by sedentary invader ants.
In San Antonio, a 150-pound pet tortoise knocked over a lamp, igniting a mattress fire that spread to a neighbor’s home.
Subscribe to the Weekly Review newsletter. Don’t worry, we won’t sell your email address!
"It is an interesting and somewhat macabre parlor game to play at a large gathering of one’s acquaintances: to speculate who in a showdown would go Nazi. By now, I think I know. I have gone through the experience many times—in Germany, in Austria, and in France. I have come to know the types: the born Nazis, the Nazis whom democracy itself has created, the certain-to-be fellow-travelers. And I also know those who never, under any conceivable circumstances, would become Nazis."