Washington Babylon — June 25, 2010, 7:38 am

Cry, Baby, Cry

It’s interesting how some teams lose a game at the World Cup and instead of complaining loudly about controversial officiating calls, take responsibility for the loss. For example, here are a few remarks made by members of the Italian team, a four-time World Cup champion, after it lost 3-2 to Slovakia yesterday and was eliminated from the Cup:

“I take full responsibility,” [Coach] Lippi said after the 3-2 loss to Slovakia. “I thought this team could do more and that’s what I prepared it to do, but when you see a team that plays with fear in their legs and in their hearts you understand that you have failed.”

“It’s everyone’s fault, not just Lippi’s. We’ve all got to be accountable,” defender Gianluca Zambrotta said. “When you finish last in a group with New Zealand, Paraguay and Slovakia, with all respect to those teams, it’s only right to go home.”

“When we get back to Italy we’re going to put helmets on,” Gattuso added. “And we’re going to accept all the criticism.”

Mind you, as the New York Times reported, “There was some bad luck, too, especially on Thursday. A shot by Quagliarella was stopped in the 67th minute, perhaps past the goal line, by the right knee of Slovak defender Martin Skrtel. Quagliarella put the ball into the net in the 85th minute but was ruled offside.”

Compare that to the reaction of players from the United States, which had a goal called back against Slovenia in its second game and ended up in a draw. Afterward players complained that the game was stolen by the refs. The referee who made the bad call — after an earlier bad call favoring the U.S. that set up the annulled goal — was caricatured as a corrupt villain. The national media was so outraged that it all but suggested that a grand conspiracy had been hatched by the referees to deny the U.S. of victory.

And people say Italians are hot-headed and egotistical.

Share
Single Page

More from Ken Silverstein:

Commentary November 17, 2015, 6:41 pm

Shaky Foundations

The Clintons’ so-called charitable enterprise has served as a vehicle to launder money and to enrich family friends.

From the November 2013 issue

Dirty South

The foul legacy of Louisiana oil

Perspective October 23, 2013, 8:00 am

On Brining and Dining

How pro-oil Louisiana politicians have shaped American environmental policy

Get access to 165 years of
Harper’s for only $45.99

United States Canada

CATEGORIES

THE CURRENT ISSUE

April 2017

Behind the Fig Leaf

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

You Can Run …

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Never Would I Ever

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

The March on Everywhere

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Defender of the Community

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Echt Deutsch

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

view Table Content

FEATURED ON HARPERS.ORG

Article
The March on Everywhere·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Photograph (detail) © Nima Taradji/Polaris
Post
The Forty-Fifth President·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Photograph (detail) by Philip Montgomery
Article
Defender of the Community·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Illustration (detail) by Katherine Streeter
Article
The Boy Without a Country·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Illustration (detail) by Shonagh Rae
Article
Asphalt Gardens·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

In a city that is rapidly pricing out the poor, NYCHA’s housing projects are a last bastion of affordable shelter, with an average monthly rent of $509
Photograph (detail) © Samuel James

Average percentage by which the amount of East Coast rainfall on a Saturday exceeds the amount on a Monday:

22

Dry-roasting peanuts makes eaters likelier to acquire an allergy.

Trump said that he might not have been elected president “if it wasn’t for Twitter."

Subscribe to the Weekly Review newsletter. Don’t worry, we won’t sell your email address!

HARPER’S FINEST

Who Goes Nazi?

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

By

"It is an interesting and somewhat macabre parlor game to play at a large gathering of one’s acquaintances: to speculate who in a showdown would go Nazi. By now, I think I know. I have gone through the experience many times—in Germany, in Austria, and in France. I have come to know the types: the born Nazis, the Nazis whom democracy itself has created, the certain-to-be fellow-travelers. And I also know those who never, under any conceivable circumstances, would become Nazis."

Subscribe Today