[No Comment ]Experts Deride Bush Torture Techniques as Foolish | Harper's Magazine

Sign in to access Harper’s Magazine

Need to create a login? Want to change your email address or password? Forgot your password?

  1. Sign in to Customer Care using your account number or postal address.
  2. Select Email/Password Information.
  3. Enter your new information and click on Save My Changes.

Locked out of your account? Get help here.

Subscribers can find additional help here.

Not a subscriber? Subscribe today!

Get Access to Print and Digital for $23.99.
Subscribe for Full Access
Get Access to Print and Digital for $23.99.
[No Comment]

Experts Deride Bush Torture Techniques as Foolish


“Enhanced interrogation techniques,” Andrew Sullivan points out today, are derived from a program developed by the Gestapo during World War II – and, indeed, even the name that Bush uses is just a translation of the term the Nazis developed.

As the Bush administration cranks up again for public approval of its torture plans, its own expert panel – the Intelligence Science Board – points out that its claims supporting the program are, simply put, lies. They characterize the “enhanced interrogation techniques” as “outmoded, amateurish and unreliable” and, as a former senior State Department official stresses, “immoral.”

They go on to point out that rather than adopt the techniques used by the Gestapo, the United States would be far better advised to adhere to the practices the United States itself applied during World War II.

These techniques were ethical and proved highly effective.

But some of the experts involved in the interrogation review, called “Educing Information,” say that during World War II, German and Japanese prisoners were effectively questioned without coercion.

“It far outclassed what we’ve done,” said Steven M. Kleinman, a former Air Force interrogator and trainer, who has studied the World War II program of interrogating Germans. The questioners at Fort Hunt, Va., “had graduate degrees in law and philosophy, spoke the language flawlessly,” and prepared for four to six hours for each hour of questioning, said Mr. Kleinman, who wrote two chapters for the December report.

More from