[No Comment ]Greenwald on Digital Surveillance | Harper's Magazine

Sign in to access Harper’s Magazine

Need to create a login? Want to change your email address or password? Forgot your password?

  1. Sign in to Customer Care using your account number or postal address.
  2. Select Email/Password Information.
  3. Enter your new information and click on Save My Changes.

Locked out of your account? Get help here.

Subscribers can find additional help here.

Not a subscriber? Subscribe today!

Get Access to Print and Digital for $23.99.
Subscribe for Full Access
Get Access to Print and Digital for $23.99.
[No Comment]

Greenwald on Digital Surveillance


Glenn Greenwald has a must-read essay at Cato Unbound surveying America’s governmental surveillance industry.

Millions of Americans supported Barack Obama with the understanding that he would begin to rein in the surveillance state. Those expectations have not been met; to the contrary, the strength and unaccountability of the surveillance state continue to grow. As Greenwald notes, congressional oversight is a farce, and there is no evidence that the massive investment in surveillance has produced any payoffs—notwithstanding a massive bill for the taxpayers and a continuous frittering away of civil liberties.

America still has the trappings of its Constitution—checks and balances, congressional oversight, and review of state action in the courts. Yet in the area of national security in general, and digital surveillance in particular, these institutions have ceased to play their intended roles. A long trail of illegal conduct, starting with the systematic and felonious violation of FISA, the persecution of whistleblowers, the evasion of court oversight as well as a consistent pattern of misrepresentation to courts, and the development of a client, rather than compliance, relationship with the Department of Justice, points to the growth of a secret inner state. It involves unjustifiable cost, makes the country no safer, and it is rotting the Constitution from within.

More from