Washington Babylon — June 21, 2010, 8:53 am

Mea Culpa: Landon Donovan Not Hateable

OK, OK, I have been convinced by readers that I was unfair to Landon Donovan. However, I still think he should never have claimed after the 2-2 draw with Solvenia that the referee had “stolen” the game. The referee made a bad call in denying the American goal but also a bad call on the foul against Slovenia beforehand that led to the free kick setting up the goal. So if the U.S. goal had been allowed, Slovenia could have argued just as strongly that it had the game “stolen” by a bad call.

Coach Bob Bradley probably put his finger on it when he said, “There are times when a referee, for whatever reason, blows a foul and now thinks either he didn’t make the correct call on the foul or from a previous play, and then literally as soon as the free kick’s taken, he blows his whistle.”

There have been a lot of bad calls during the Cup — though only the one against the U.S. led the media to accuse the referee of high crimes and misdemeanors — but in the end referees generally don’t cause a team to win or lose. The U.S. didn’t win because it fell behind Slovenia 2-0 and had to dig out of a hole, not because of the refereeing, so stop all the whining and move on.

As to reader email, here are excerpts from a few:

Beau Dure:

I’m guessing that you’re reading rather than hearing or seeing Donovan’s comments. I’ve interviewed him countless times since 2000, and one thing he does not do is throw a tantrum…He’s also right, at least most of the time. He’s right about the Slovenia game.

I can’t argue too much with your critique of the U.S. team in general, and by extension, the U.S. talent pool. It is somewhat astounding that a country of 300 million can’t come up with more than one or two field players of Donovan and Dempsey’s quality. (Goalkeepers, on the other hand, are usually in surplus.) But Donovan’s correct in saying not too many teams could’ve done what they did against Slovenia. The old saw that a two-goal lead is the most dangerous in soccer is absolutely untrue, especially in the World Cup. Teams just don’t come back from that, especially when every break and every call is going against them. (Before Slovenia’s goal, we had the phantom handball in the box on Robbie Findley that stopped a terrific scoring chance in its tracks.)

Donovan’s an interesting guy. He’s self-critical to a fault and refreshingly honest.

Michael Miller:

As a fellow journalist, I am a very big fan of your incisive writing and reporting. On the issue of hating the American soccer team, however, I think you have your wires crossed.

Strangely enough, it is a debate I often have with my 65-year-old Marxist historian father who, with U.S. imperial politics clearly on display in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere, never fails to root against the Yanks come the World Cup.

But to treat the U.S. team – let alone its captain, Landon Donovan – as a figurehead for American empire is silly. Quoting U.S. and Slovenia’s GDP simply obscures the fact that on soccer terms, the two are very much alike (unlike Brazil and North Korea, ranked 105th in the world). Slovenia is ranked a mere 11 spots below the U.S., while Algeria – Team USA’s next opponents – are 16 spots below the Americans. In fact, this tiny standard of deviation makes Group C – not Brazil’s group – one of the tournament’s most competitive.

It seems to me as if you would have it both ways, pointing out that England is not the SOCCER superpower it once was, but resorting to geo-political metrics to shame those who would root for the Americans.

One comment: I don’t view soccer or any sport through the lens of politics. I root against the U.S. team because, among other reasons, they don’t play soccer very well, they whine a lot, and I am repelled by the gung-ho patriotic media coverage.

Random World Cup observation: I feel sorry for Honduras, which Spain is likely to pummel today. England, France, and Italy have looked awful thus far and appear to be mediocre teams. Spain looked great against Switzerland but just had bad luck, and it should take out its frustrations on Honduras this afternoon. Spain should still get through to the second round. If it does it would play Brazil or Portugal in the quarterfinals, which, either way, would be one of the best games in the Cup.

Share
Single Page

More from Ken Silverstein:

Commentary November 17, 2015, 6:41 pm

Shaky Foundations

The Clintons’ so-called charitable enterprise has served as a vehicle to launder money and to enrich family friends.

From the November 2013 issue

Dirty South

The foul legacy of Louisiana oil

Perspective October 23, 2013, 8:00 am

On Brining and Dining

How pro-oil Louisiana politicians have shaped American environmental policy

Get access to 167 years of
Harper’s for only $45.99

United States Canada

CATEGORIES

THE CURRENT ISSUE

February 2018

The Bodies in The Forest

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

The Minds of Others

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Modern Despots

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Before the Deluge

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Notes to Self

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Within Reach

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

view Table Content

FEATURED ON HARPERS.ORG

Article
Pushing the Limit·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

In the early Eighties, Andy King, the coach of the Seawolves, a swim club in Danville, California, instructed Debra Denithorne, aged twelve, to do doubles — to practice in the morning and the afternoon. King told Denithorne’s parents that he saw in her the potential to receive a college scholarship, and even to compete in the Olympics. Tall swimmers have an advantage in the water, and by the time Denithorne turned thirteen, she was five foot eight. She dropped soccer and a religious group to spend more time at the pool.

Illustration by Shonagh Rae
Article
The Minds of Others·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Progress is impossible without change,” George Bernard Shaw wrote in 1944, “and those who cannot change their minds cannot change anything.” But progress through persuasion has never seemed harder to achieve. Political segregation has made many Americans inaccessible, even unimaginable, to those on the other side of the partisan divide. On the rare occasions when we do come face-to-face, it is not clear what we could say to change each other’s minds or reach a worthwhile compromise. Psychological research has shown that humans often fail to process facts that conflict with our preexisting worldviews. The stakes are simply too high: our self-worth and identity are entangled with our beliefs — and with those who share them. The weakness of logic as a tool of persuasion, combined with the urgency of the political moment, can be paralyzing.

Yet we know that people do change their minds. We are constantly molded by our environment and our culture, by the events of the world, by the gossip we hear and the books we read. In the essays that follow, seven writers explore the ways that persuasion operates in our lives, from the intimate to the far-reaching. Some consider the ethics and mechanics of persuasion itself — in religion, politics, and foreign policy — and others turn their attention to the channels through which it acts, such as music, protest, and technology. How, they ask, can we persuade others to join our cause or see things the way we do? And when it comes to our own openness to change, how do we decide when to compromise and when to resist?

Illustration (detail) by Lincoln Agnew
Article
Within Reach·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

On a balmy day last spring, Connor Chase sat on a red couch in the waiting room of a medical clinic in Columbus, Ohio, and watched the traffic on the street. His bleached-blond hair fell into his eyes as he scrolled through his phone to distract himself. Waiting to see Mimi Rivard, a nurse practitioner, was making Chase nervous: it would be the first time he would tell a medical professional that he was transgender.

By the time he arrived at the Equitas Health clinic, Chase was eighteen, and had long since come to dread doctors and hospitals. As a child, he’d had asthma, migraines, two surgeries for a tumor that had caused deafness in one ear, and gangrene from an infected bug bite. Doctors had always assumed he was a girl. After puberty, Chase said, he avoided looking in the mirror because his chest and hips “didn’t feel like my body.” He liked it when strangers saw him as male, but his voice was high-pitched, so he rarely spoke in public. Then, when Chase was fourteen, he watched a video on YouTube in which a twentysomething trans man described taking testosterone to lower his voice and appear more masculine. Suddenly, Chase had an explanation for how he felt — and what he wanted.

Illustration by Taylor Callery
Article
Before the Deluge·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

In the summer of 2016, when Congress installed a financial control board to address Puerto Rico’s crippling debt, I traveled to San Juan, the capital. The island owed some $120 billion, and Wall Street was demanding action. On the news, President Obama announced his appointments to the Junta de Supervisión y Administración Financiera. “The task ahead for Puerto Rico is not an easy one,” he said. “But I am confident Puerto Rico is up to the challenge of stabilizing the fiscal situation, restoring growth, and building a better future for all Puerto Ricans.” Among locals, however, the control board was widely viewed as a transparent effort to satisfy mainland creditors — just the latest tool of colonialist plundering that went back generations.

Photograph from Puerto Rico by Christopher Gregory
Article
Monumental Error·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

In 1899, the art critic Layton Crippen complained in the New York Times that private donors and committees had been permitted to run amok, erecting all across the city a large number of “painfully ugly monuments.” The very worst statues had been dumped in Central Park. “The sculptures go as far toward spoiling the Park as it is possible to spoil it,” he wrote. Even worse, he lamented, no organization had “power of removal” to correct the damage that was being done.

Illustration by Steve Brodner

Amount American Airlines saved in 1987 by eliminating one olive from each salad served in first class:

$40,000

A daddy longlegs preserved in amber 99 million years ago was found to have an erection.

Trump tweeted that he had created “jobs, jobs, jobs” since becoming president, and it was reported that Trump plans to bolster job creation by loosening regulations on the global sale of US-made artillery, warships, fighter jets, and drones.

Subscribe to the Weekly Review newsletter. Don’t worry, we won’t sell your email address!

HARPER’S FINEST

Report — From the June 2013 issue

How to Make Your Own AR-15

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

By

"Gun owners have long been the hypochondriacs of American politics. Over the past twenty years, the gun-rights movement has won just about every battle it has fought; states have passed at least a hundred laws loosening gun restrictions since President Obama took office. Yet the National Rifle Association has continued to insist that government confiscation of privately owned firearms is nigh. The NRA’s alarmism helped maintain an active membership, but the strategy was risky: sooner or later, gun guys might have realized that they’d been had. Then came the shootings at a movie theater in Aurora, Colorado, and at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, followed swiftly by the nightmare the NRA had been promising for decades: a dedicated push at every level of government for new gun laws. The gun-rights movement was now that most insufferable of species: a hypochondriac taken suddenly, seriously ill."

Subscribe Today