Press Rogue — March 22, 2019, 3:04 pm

Rain Check

When a bomb cyclone hit the Great Plains last Wednesday, the national media responded, predictably, with a few weather reports. The Washington Post told of the cyclone’s heavy winds, the “blizzard conditions” it had engendered in Colorado, and how a combination of rain and melting snow in “the transition zone between the warm and cold sectors of the storm” could pose “a flooding threat in eastern Nebraska and Minnesota, southeast South Dakota, Iowa, Wisconsin and northern Michigan.” Just one person, a National Weather Service meteorologist, was quoted in the story.

Only once a biblical two inches of rain had run off from the frozen earth and into the Missouri River and its tributaries, causing horrific flooding across much of Nebraska and Iowa, did outlets like CNN jump in, relaying information about the number of levees that had been destroyed and an image of a nuclear power plant surrounded by water.

As the deluge spread, some news organizations in New York and Washington took greater notice, but practically none had deployed reporters to the scene, so they were forced to rely on wire services, social media, and phone interviews with emergency management officials. On Saturday, journalist Ted Genoways, who lives outside Lincoln, beseeched national outlets to put boots on the ground. “Much of the Great Plains is underwater and has been for days,” he tweeted, “I’ve been looking for a single story in the @nytimes or @washingtonpost reported from west of Chicago. Nothing.”

He got his wish two days later, when a team of Times reporters filed a story from Verdigre, Nebraska, that, as Genoways gratefully noted, was full of “details you can’t get from NYC.” Just look at the story’s gripping lede, featuring “ice chunks the size of small cars” and calves being “swept into freezing floodwaters, washing up dead along the banks of swollen rivers.” The Post, for its part, simply assigned Genoways to cover the floods himself, which he did in a heart-wrenching report from the ravaged town of Fremont.

Vital as this recent reporting from the nation’s premier newspapers has been, its tardiness underscores how unprepared editors in New York and Washington are for stories outside their usual terrain. Had they been more closely monitoring the region, they might have noticed when the Omaha World-Herald reported, a mere week before the arrival of the cyclone, on a National Weather Service presentation describing an “increased risk for major flooding,” and interviewed a hydrologist who warned: “If you had a checklist for the things you don’t want to have for flooding to be worse, we’re checking all the boxes. The recipe is there.”

If CNN or the Post had teams of reporters based in the Great Plains, they might have had that World-Herald story in mind last Tuesday, when Nebraska Governor Pete Ricketts issued a preemptive emergency declaration. They might have realized that the flooding Ricketts warned of was worse than what is typical for spring on the prairie, where rivers’ unpredictability is a constant concern. Just last year, southeastern Iowa saw four floods. When the last one struck in October, Davenport’s Public Works Director was hardly alarmed, calling it a “run of the mill flood.” But for the New York editor or producer who doesn’t watch Big Ten football and has never eaten Quad Cities pizza, the distinction between “run of the mill” and “devastating” can be hard to grasp.

This lack of investment may explain why CNN was so quick to tie a bow on the story. By Tuesday, the network’s coverage had transitioned into feel-good mode, with an item about private pilots offering free rides to stranded residents. The same day, Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds held a press conference cautioning that the threat of severe flooding to her state could continue throughout the spring. That didn’t stop CNN from moving on—by Thursday, there was hardly any mention of the flooding on its website aside from a summary article that hadn’t been updated in days.

The Times, at least, deserves credit for not sending its reporters home at the first sign of the floodwater’s relent. Yesterday, they ran a lengthy article featuring an Army Corps of Engineers official who operates six dams on the upper Missouri, and who was saddled with an unenviable decision: “Should he try to hold back the surging Missouri River but risk destroying a major dam, potentially releasing a 45-foot wall of water? Or should he relieve the pressure by opening the spillway, purposefully adding to the flooding of towns, homes and farmland for hundreds of miles[?]” He decided to unleash the water to save the dam, and in doing so inundated a local farm. The Times interviewed that farmer, David Lueth, who described abandoning his home as “like leaving your child at the I.C.U.” The story is a profound reminder of how intricately managed the rivers of the American interior have become in the past century, and how acts of God, on the Prairie, are often also acts of man.

Still, the historical detail that the Times felt the need to include shows how little it assumes its readers know about the region. The context offered dates back to the Dust Bowl—how can one write about the Great Plains without invoking The Grapes of Wrath?—and detours briefly to White Swan, the Yankton Sioux settlement that was submerged by Army Corps engineers who refused to relocate the Fort Randall Dam. This information may be helpful for those unfamiliar with the cultural and environmental dynamics at play, but it’s old hat to anyone who has spent significant time in this particular corner of flyover country.

Coastal ambivalence to the Prairie is nothing new. The likes of Des Moines and Sioux City are hardly large enough to merit a bureau in the era of cost-cutting, and the staid agricultural economies that predominate around the Missouri River only generate headlines when they’re caught up in some macro narrative, such as the depression in soybean prices caused by Trump’s trade war with China. (Much of the Wall Street Journal’s coverage of the flooding focused on the estimated $840 million in damages the already reeling ag industry has suffered.) In Nebraska, an old joke has it that the two largest cities are Omaha and the Huskers’ Memorial Stadium on Saturdays. That New York or L.A. isn’t paying much attention to the state and its neighbors may be aggravating to its mostly rural residents, but given the harsh calculus editors perform daily to determine their coverage, surely the fact that Nebraska’s population is smaller than that of metropolitan San Antonio comes into play.

This gets at a distinction which often gets lost in talk about the national media. A mandate to cover the whole country does not necessarily translate into equal coverage of each and every region. The inherent promise of the Times, CNN, or Newsweek is that they will fill you in on the most important things happening in the United States, but they will do so assuming you are far from the action; if you’re a local, the thinking goes, you’d be better served by your town’s papers and broadcast stations, which, theoretically, should provide much more timely and in-depth reporting.

That all sounds great. But when someone like Genoways pleads for the Post or the Times to take notice, it’s not simply because of their prose. It’s because of their influence: if the Times is covering something, every editor and producer suddenly needs to make a decision on whether to follow suit. As long as flooding in the Great Plains remains a local story, pleas for help won’t go far. Once a story goes national, more resources for recovery come into play; that it took a week for the President to offer federal aid to Nebraska surely has something to do with the national media’s belated coverage. This dynamic is likely to continue. Yesterday, NOAA issued a new report stating, as the Times put it in a headline, “25 States Are at Risk of Serious Flooding This Spring.” Flooding is not just a local problem, and even if it were, we now live in an age where local media has become so diminished that national news sources are often the default product consumers look to in times of crisis. Omaha and Des Moines are lucky enough to still have the World-Herald and the Register, but what happens when there’s a disaster in Pittsburgh, which lost its daily print newspaper last August, or in Birmingham, Alabama, which hasn’t had one since 2012?

Small cities are watching their journalistic institutions decay while the Times, Post, and Journal gain subscribers. As the crossfade between local and national media grows more extreme, communities across the country, when faced with disaster, increasingly look to New York and Washington for information. Under these circumstances, the view-from-five-thousand-feet approach to reporting will have to change. While the Times and its fellows may have been historically justified in paying less attention to less populated corners of the nation, leaving that muckraking to the locals, the excuses for not having someone on staff in every state feel thinner and thinner by the year. When the time comes to spend all those new subscription dollars, a national paper could do worse than opening up a bureau in Omaha.

Share
Single Page

More from Kyle Paoletta:

Press Rogue May 23, 2019, 2:59 pm

One Horse Town

Press Rogue May 16, 2019, 4:00 pm

Playing With Fire

Press Rogue May 9, 2019, 4:00 pm

Boys on the Bus

Get access to 169 years of
Harper’s for only $23.99

United States Canada

CATEGORIES

THE CURRENT ISSUE

February 2020

Trumpism After Trump

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

“My Gang Is Jesus”

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

The Cancer Chair

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

The Birds

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

The Skinning Tree

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

The Interpretation of Dreams

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Dearest Lizzie

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

view Table Content

FEATURED ON HARPERS.ORG

Article
Trumpism After Trump·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

The city was not beautiful; no one made that claim for it. At the height of summer, people in suits, shellacked by the sun, moved like harassed insects to avoid the concentrated light. There was a civil war–like fracture in America—the president had said so—but little of it showed in the capital. Everyone was polite and smooth in their exchanges. The corridor between Dupont Circle and Georgetown was like the dream of Yugoslav planners: long blocks of uniform earth-toned buildings that made the classical edifices of the Hill seem the residue of ancestors straining for pedigree. Bunting, starched and perfectly ruffled in red-white-and-blue fans, hung everywhere—from air conditioners, from gutters, from statues of dead revolutionaries. Coming from Berlin, where the manual laborers are white, I felt as though I was entering the heart of a caste civilization. Untouchables in hard hats drilled into sidewalks, carried pylons, and ate lunch from metal boxes, while waiters in restaurants complimented old respectable bobbing heads on how well they were progressing with their rib eyes and iceberg wedges.

I had come to Washington to witness either the birth of an ideology or what may turn out to be the passing of a kidney stone through the Republican Party. There was a new movement afoot: National Conservatives, they called themselves, and they were gathering here, at the Ritz-Carlton, at 22nd Street and M. Disparate tribes had posted up for the potlatch: reformacons, blood-and-soilers, curious liberal nationalists, “Austrians,” repentant neocons, evangelical Christians, corporate raiders, cattle ranchers, Silicon Valley dissidents, Buckleyites, Straussians, Orthodox Jews, Catholics, Mormons, Tories, dark-web spiders, tradcons, Lone Conservatives, Fed-Socs, Young Republicans, Reaganites in amber. Most straddled more than one category.

Article
The Cancer Chair·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

The second-worst thing about cancer chairs is that they are attached to televisions. Someone somewhere is always at war with silence. It’s impossible to read, so I answer email, or watch some cop drama on my computer, or, if it seems unavoidable, explore the lives of my nurses. A trip to Cozumel with old girlfriends, a costume party with political overtones, an advanced degree on the internet: they’re all the same, these lives, which is to say that the nurses tell me nothing, perhaps because amid the din and pain it’s impossible to say anything of substance, or perhaps because they know that nothing is precisely what we both expect. It’s the very currency of the place. Perhaps they are being excruciatingly candid.

There is a cancer camaraderie I’ve never felt. That I find inimical, in fact. Along with the official optimism that percolates out of pamphlets, the milestone celebrations that seem aimed at children, the lemonade people squeeze out of their tumors. My stoniness has not always served me well. Among the cancer staff, there is special affection for the jocular sufferer, the one who makes light of lousy bowel movements and extols the spiritual tonic of neuropathy. And why not? Spend your waking life in hell, and you too might cherish the soul who’d learned to praise the flames. I can’t do it. I’m not chipper by nature, and just hearing the word cancer makes me feel like I’m wearing a welder’s mask.

Article
“My Gang Is Jesus”·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

When Demétrio Martins was ready to preach, he pushed a joystick that angled the seat of his wheelchair forward, slowly lifting him to a standing position. Restraints held his body upright. His atrophied right arm lay on an armrest, and with his left hand, he put a microphone to his lips. “Proverbs, chapter fourteen, verse twelve,” he said. “ ‘There is a way which seems right to a man, but its end is . . .’ ”

The congregation finished: “ ‘Death.’ ”

The Assembly of God True Grapevine was little more than a fluorescent-lit room wedged between a bar and an empty lot in Jacaré, a poor neighborhood on Rio de Janeiro’s north side. A few dozen people sat in the rows of plastic lawn chairs that served as pews, while shuddering wall fans circulated hot air. The congregation was largely female; of the few men in attendance, most wore collared shirts and old leather shoes. Now and then, Martins veered from Portuguese into celestial tongues. People rose from their seats, thrust their hands into the air, and shouted, “Hallelujah!”

Article
The Birds·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

On December 7, 2016, a drone departed from an Amazon warehouse in the United Kingdom, ascended to an altitude of four hundred feet, and flew to a nearby farm. There it glided down to the front lawn and released from its clutches a small box containing an Amazon streaming device and a bag of popcorn. This was the first successful flight of Prime Air, Amazon’s drone delivery program. If instituted as a regular service, it would slash the costs of “last-mile delivery,” the shortest and most expensive leg of a package’s journey from warehouse to doorstep. Drones don’t get into fender benders, don’t hit rush-hour traffic, and don’t need humans to accompany them, all of which, Amazon says, could enable it to offer thirty-minute delivery for up to 90 percent of domestic shipments while also reducing carbon emissions. After years of testing, Amazon wrote to the Federal Aviation Administration last summer to ask for permission to conduct limited commercial deliveries with its drones, attaching this diagram to show how the system would work. (Amazon insisted that we note that the diagram is not to scale.) Amazon is not the only company working toward such an automated future—­UPS, FedEx, Uber, and Google’s parent company, Alphabet, have similar programs—­but its plans offer the most detailed vision of what seems to be an impending reality, one in which parce­l-toting drones are a constant presence in the sky, doing much more than just delivering popcorn.

Article
The Skinning Tree·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Every year in Lusk, Wyoming, during the second week of July, locals gather to reenact a day in 1849 when members of a nearby band of Sioux are said to have skinned a white man alive. None of the actors are Native American. The white participants dress up like Indians and redden their skin with body paint made from iron ore.

The town prepares all year, and the performance, The Legend of Rawhide, has a cast and crew of hundreds, almost all local volunteers, including elementary school children. There are six generations of Rawhide actors in one family; three or four generations seems to be the average. The show is performed twice, on Friday and Saturday night.

The plot is based on an event that, as local legend has it, occurred fifteen miles south of Lusk, in Rawhide Buttes. It goes like this: Clyde Pickett is traveling with a wagon train to California. He tells the other Pioneers: “The only good Injun’s a dead Injun.” Clyde loves Kate Farley, and to impress her, he shoots the first Indian he sees, who happens to be an Indian Princess. The Indians approach the Pioneers and ask that the murderer give himself up. Clyde won’t admit he did it. The Indians attack the wagon train and, eventually, Clyde surrenders. The Indians tie Clyde to the Skinning Tree and flay him alive. Later, Kate retrieves her dead lover’s body and the wagon train continues west.

Cost of renting a giant panda from the Chinese government, per day:

$1,500

A recent earthquake in Chile was found to have shifted the city of Concepción ten feet to the west, shortened Earth’s days by 1.26 microseconds, and shifted the planet’s axis by nearly three inches.

In response to a major volcanic eruption, President Rodrigo Duterte of the Philippines vowed he would “eat that ashfall. I’m even going to pee on Taal, that goddamned volcano.”

Subscribe to the Weekly Review newsletter. Don’t worry, we won’t sell your email address!

HARPER’S FINEST

Jesus Plus Nothing

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

By

At Ivanwald, men learn to be leaders by loving their leaders. “They’re so busy loving us,” a brother once explained to me, “but who’s loving them?” We were. The brothers each paid $400 per month for room and board, but we were also the caretakers of The Cedars, cleaning its gutters, mowing its lawns, whacking weeds and blowing leaves and sanding. And we were called to serve on Tuesday mornings, when The Cedars hosted a regular prayer breakfast typically presided over by Ed Meese, the former attorney general. Each week the breakfast brought together a rotating group of ambassadors, businessmen, and American politicians. Three of Ivanwald’s brothers also attended, wearing crisp shirts starched just for the occasion; one would sit at the table while the other two poured coffee. 

Subscribe Today