No Comment — July 25, 2007, 8:25 am

Politicizing the Civil Service

For the last couple of months we’ve been focusing on the politicization of the Justice Department under both John Ashcroft and Alberto Gonzales, and the significant number of prosecutions brought and quashed which appear to have been politically directed. But we need to keep an eye on the bigger picture.

Karl Rove has played a key role in the politicization of almost every department of the federal government. And by “politicization” in this context, we mean the process of redirecting federal personnel and assets to the accomplishment of a partisan political agenda. That means, first and foremost, doing exactly what Karl Rove sits in the White House to do: namely, insuring the election of Republican candidates to elective office and the defeat of Democrats. So far it appears that Rove or his immediate subordinates made trips, usually with powerpoint briefing presentations, to agencies all over Washington and gave presentations designed to bolster Republican Party morale and to make clear what the party’s objectives were in the coming elections. The briefings frequently identified specific Democrats who hold office who were to be taken out, at the polls, or in some other way (Alberto Gonzales, of course, is one of the experts in the “other ways”).

The list of agencies empressed into GOP electoral politics is stunning. Here’s the Washington Post’s current tally:

State Department
Treasury Department
Agriculture Department
Interior Department
Labor Department
Department of Education
Energy Department
Commerce Department
Department of Veterans Affairs
Transportation Department
Department of Health and Human Services
Department of Housing and Urban Development
General Services Administration
Environmental Protection Agency
NASA
Small Business Administration
Office of Science and Technology Policy
Office of National Drug Control Policy
U.S. Agency for International Development
Peace Corps

The Department of Homeland Security has so far failed to respond to queries, which is the standard practice of Homeland Security, the newest government agency and the one whose name still sounds far better in the original German (this is Ministerium für Staatssicherheit, affectionately known to generations of GDR citizens as “Stasi,” rendered into English). But our information is that DHS was one of the points of most intense action, and indeed it’s ability to disseminate fear on cue has been essential to GOP electoral efforts in three successive elections.

Further evidence of a widespread agenda to politicize the government comes now in the form of a piece by Paul Kane of The Washington Post, who today details political briefings administered to Department of State officials by Karl Rove’s subordinates at his direction. The news seems to indicate an unquestionable violation of the Hatch Act, the law prohibiting federal employees from becoming engaged in politics and using government resources for partisan efforts. A number of ambassadors sat for the non-obligatory briefings, which covered various gubernatorial and Congressional elections from 2001 to 2006. The meetings were designed to explain Republican strategies for upcoming elections, and to address such political losses as those experienced by the GOP in 2006:

According to a department letter to the Senate panel, Rove [in one briefing] explained the White House views on the electoral disaster while Sara M. Taylor, then the director of White House political affairs, showed a PowerPoint presentation that pinned most of the electoral blame on “corrupt” GOP lawmakers and “complacent incumbents.” One chart in Taylor’s presentation highlighted the GOP’s top 36 targets among House Democrats for the 2008 election.

A major Executive agency hirtherto thought to be nonpolitical even in the wake of the DOJ scandals has been breached by the meddling of Karl Rove. The news provides circumstantial evidence that, when paired with massive evidence of politically-motivated prosecutions at Justice, suggests widespread efforts by the White House to inappropriately manipulate the government for partisan ends. It’s not terrible for some Ambassadors to be staunch Republicans. The real tragedy is the damage done by Karl Rove and his amateur political underlings to Executive agencies that must retain an appearance of political neutrality to function effectively. In the midsts of major foreign policy challenges, what’s the message being sent by the White House? Forget diplomacy. We put no confidence in that in any event. We put our faith in force of arms. We need all of you out there in the electoral trenches, turning out the base. Remember where your bread is buttered.

This entire program constitutes a conspiracy to undermine the Hatch Act, carried out over a protracted period and involving hundreds of federal employees. It is a serious crime. But what is the reaction of Alberto Gonzales’s Justice Department? He seems to have forgotten about it. Terrible, all those lapses of memory.

Share
Single Page

More from Scott Horton:

Conversation August 5, 2016, 12:08 pm

Lincoln’s Party

Sidney Blumenthal on the origins of the Republican Party, the fallout from Clinton’s emails, and his new biography of Abraham Lincoln

Conversation March 30, 2016, 3:44 pm

Burn Pits

Joseph Hickman discusses his new book, The Burn Pits, which tells the story of thousands of U.S. soldiers who, after returning from Iraq and Afghanistan, have developed rare cancers and respiratory diseases.

Context, No Comment August 28, 2015, 12:16 pm

Beltway Secrecy

In five easy lessons

Get access to 165 years of
Harper’s for only $45.99

United States Canada

CATEGORIES

THE CURRENT ISSUE

September 2016

Tearing Up the Map

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Land of Sod

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Only an Apocalypse Can Save Us Now

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

The Watchmen

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Acceptable Losses

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Home

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

view Table Content

FEATURED ON HARPERS.ORG

Post
 
Andrew Cockburn on the Saudi slaughter in Yemen, Alan Jacobs on the disappearance of Christian intellectuals, a forum on a post-Obama foreign policy, a story by Alice McDermott, and more
Artwork by Ingo Günther
Article
Land of Sod·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Nobody in academia had ever witnessed or even heard of a performance like this before. In just a few years, in the early 1950s, a University of Pennsylvania graduate student — a student, in his twenties — had taken over an entire field of study, linguistics, and stood it on its head and hardened it from a spongy so-called “social science” into a real science, a hard science, and put his name on it: Noam Chomsky.

At the time, Chomsky was still finishing his doctoral dissertation for Penn, where he had completed his graduate-school course work. But at bedtime and in his heart of hearts he was living in Boston as a junior member of Harvard’s Society of Fellows, and creating a Harvard-level name for himself.

Photograph by Mike Slack
Article
The Watchmen·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Nobody in academia had ever witnessed or even heard of a performance like this before. In just a few years, in the early 1950s, a University of Pennsylvania graduate student — a student, in his twenties — had taken over an entire field of study, linguistics, and stood it on its head and hardened it from a spongy so-called “social science” into a real science, a hard science, and put his name on it: Noam Chomsky.

At the time, Chomsky was still finishing his doctoral dissertation for Penn, where he had completed his graduate-school course work. But at bedtime and in his heart of hearts he was living in Boston as a junior member of Harvard’s Society of Fellows, and creating a Harvard-level name for himself.

Illustration by John Ritter
Article
The Origins of Speech·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

"To Chomsky...every child’s language organ could use the 'deep structure,' 'universal grammar,' and 'language acquisition device' he was born with to express what he had to say, no matter whether it came out of his mouth in English or Urdu or Nagamese."
Illustration (detail) by Darrel Rees. Source photograph © Miroslav Dakov/Alamy Live News
Article
Acceptable Losses·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Nobody in academia had ever witnessed or even heard of a performance like this before. In just a few years, in the early 1950s, a University of Pennsylvania graduate student — a student, in his twenties — had taken over an entire field of study, linguistics, and stood it on its head and hardened it from a spongy so-called “social science” into a real science, a hard science, and put his name on it: Noam Chomsky.

At the time, Chomsky was still finishing his doctoral dissertation for Penn, where he had completed his graduate-school course work. But at bedtime and in his heart of hearts he was living in Boston as a junior member of Harvard’s Society of Fellows, and creating a Harvard-level name for himself.

Photograph by Alex Potter

Chances that college students select as “most desirable‚” the same face chosen by the chickens:

49 in 50

Most of the United States’ 36,000 yearly bunk-bed injuries involve male victims.

In Italy, a legislator called for parents who feed their children vegan diets to be sentenced to up to six years in prison, and in Sweden, a woman attempted to vindicate her theft of six pairs of underwear by claiming she had severe diarrhea.

Subscribe to the Weekly Review newsletter. Don’t worry, we won’t sell your email address!

HARPER’S FINEST

Mississippi Drift

By

Matt was happy enough to sustain himself on the detritus of a world he saw as careening toward self-destruction, and equally happy to scam a government he despised. 'I’m glad everyone’s so wasteful,' he told me. 'It supports my lifestyle.'

Subscribe Today