SIGN IN to access Harper’s Magazine
1. Sign in to Customer Care using your account number or postal address.
2. Select Email/Password Information.
3. Enter your new information and click on Save My Changes.
Subscribers can find additional help here. Not a subscriber? Subscribe today!
Andrew Marshall, head of the Pentagon’s Office of Net Assessment (ONA), has been working at the Defense Department for more than three decades and has never met a threat to national security he didn’t like. During the Cold War, the ONA was charged with assessing the Soviet threat to national security and it always described said threat in the most alarming terms. During the Reagan years Marshall helped write a secret document that called for the United States to have the ability to fight and win a nuclear war with Russia and in late-1989, after the fall of the Berlin Wall and with the Soviet Union on its last legs, Marshall was still calling for big increases in military spending.
Since them, Marshall’s office has produced studies pointing to major threats from countries such as North Korea and China, and supported a host of new weapons systems, including variants of Star Wars “Andy’s one of those defense intellectuals who’re always there to come up with the stuff that backs the needs of industry,” an ex-Pentagon staffer once told me.
So it’s interesting that Laura Rozen has discovered that Alexis Debat, the disgraced “terrorism expert” and former ABC News consultant, has been working on a study contracted by the ONA. According to Rozen, Debat was doing work on a report produced by the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments think tank and was funded by Marshall’s shop.
The Center’s Andrew Krepinevich told Rozen that “he had hired Debat as a consultant in April 2007 to provide analytical support overseeing a contract from the Pentagon Office of Net Assessment.” He wouldn’t say what the study was about, but two sources told Rozen that the topic was radical Islam.
Krepinevich has terminated Debat’s relationship with the Center, but the work on the report for ONA apparently will continue. The United States does face a real threat from radical Islam, but my guess is that any study for Marshall’s shop will hype it far out of proportions and call for a military answer to what is largely a political problem.
More from Ken Silverstein:
Perspective — October 23, 2013, 8:00 am
How pro-oil Louisiana politicians have shaped American environmental policy
Postcard — October 16, 2013, 8:00 am
A trip to one of the properties at issue in Louisiana’s oil-pollution lawsuits
Acres of hemp grown by “patriotic‚” U.S. farmers in 1942 at the behest of the U.S. government:
A study suggested that the health effects of exposure to nuclear radiation at Chernobyl were no worse than ill health resulting from smoking and normal urban air pollution.
Greenpeace apologized after activists accidentally defaced the site of Peru’s 2,000-year-old Nazca Lines when they unfurled cloth letters reading “time for change” near the ancient sand drawings. “We fully understand,” the group wrote in a statement, “that this looks bad.”
Subscribe to the Weekly Review newsletter. Don’t worry, we won’t sell your email address!
“I hope that after reading the following pages the leaders of the Y. M. C. A. will start a campaign to induce good young men to do nothing. If so, I shall not have lived in vain.”