SIGN IN to access Harper’s Magazine
1. Sign in to Customer Care using your account number or postal address.
2. Select Email/Password Information.
3. Enter your new information and click on Save My Changes.
Subscribers can find additional help here. Not a subscriber? Subscribe today!
A meeting of the House Intelligence Committee abruptly terminated this morning when Justice Department officials called to testify about their review of an internal CIA report on the 2001 shootdown of a plane over Peru that was carrying American missionaries refused to take the oath. Two innocent persons died due to a mistake confusing their plane with one being used to transport drugs. The Associated Press reports Justice’s meager effort at cover:
Justice Department spokeswoman Tracy Schmaler said Justice employees “have previously briefed committee staff on this matter and were prepared to provide a similar informal briefing to committee members. We are unaware of any precedent for Department officials providing informal briefings to be placed under oath,” she said.
The issue of administering the oath to Justice Department spokesmen became more acute after a parade of high-level Justice Department officials appeared before Congressional committees in 2007-08 and gave false testimony concerning the politicization of the department, particularly in connection with the U.S. attorneys scandal.
Ranking Republican Pete Hoekstra has raised questions for some time about the CIA’s handling of the Peru incident. Hoekstra says that CIA report, which remains classified, identifies agents who misled Congress and obstructed a Justice Department investigation into criminal charges. In 2005, the Justice Department decided against any criminal action, but its explanations for the decision have not satisfied many observers.
So far, Justice has failed to bring a single prosecution in any of the cases in which its representatives misled Congress. In one case, involving former Civil Rights Division head Brad Schlozman, the decision not to prosecute came notwithstanding conclusions that Schlozman’s false statements were material and were not a matter of innocent forgetfulness. The refusal of Justice officials today to testify under oath before the Intelligence Committee will only serve to highlight the department’s on-going problems with telling the truth before oversight bodies.
More from Scott Horton:
Conversation — August 5, 2016, 12:08 pm
Sidney Blumenthal on the origins of the Republican Party, the fallout from Clinton’s emails, and his new biography of Abraham Lincoln
Conversation — March 30, 2016, 3:44 pm
Joseph Hickman discusses his new book, The Burn Pits, which tells the story of thousands of U.S. soldiers who, after returning from Iraq and Afghanistan, have developed rare cancers and respiratory diseases.
Years ago, I lived in Montana, a land of purple sunsets, clear streams, and snowflakes the size of silver dollars drifting through the cold air. There were no speed limits and you could legally drive drunk. My small apartment in Missoula had little privacy. In order to write, I rented an off-season fishing cabin on Rock Creek, a one-room place with a bed and a bureau. I lacked the budget for a desk. My idea was to remove a sliding door from a closet in my apartment and place it over a couple of hastily cobbled-together sawhorses.
Average exam score, in a SUNY-Fredonia study, for students who only listened to a podcast of their professor’s lecture:
Boys in Taiwan are likelier than girls to vomit in order to lose weight.
Hundreds of women in yoga pants marched through Barrington, Rhode Island, to defend their right to wear the garment, and Trump vowed to sue every woman accusing him of sexual assault. “I look so forward to doing that,” he said.
Subscribe to the Weekly Review newsletter. Don’t worry, we won’t sell your email address!
"She never thanked me, never looked at me—melted away into the miserable night, in the strangest manner I ever saw. I have seen many strange things, but not one that has left a deeper impression on my memory than the dull impassive way in which that worn-out heap of misery took that piece of money, and was lost."