SIGN IN to access Harper’s Magazine
Need to create a login? Want to change your email address or password? Forgot your password?
1. Sign in to Customer Care using your account number or postal address.
2. Select Email/Password Information.
3. Enter your new information and click on Save My Changes.
Subscribers can find additional help here. Not a subscriber? Subscribe today!
“I came to the conclusion very soon that this probably wasn’t the right way to go. Probably before I left Guantanamo, I was of the opinion it needed to go away as soon as possible. I think we lost the moral high ground.” These are the words of Marine Major General Michael Lehnert, the man who, as it turns out, built the special prison at Guantánamo, delivered in an interview last week just before his retirement. Lehnert is hardly an outlier among the brass on this issue. Increasingly, senior retired military leaders are speaking out against former Vice President Dick Cheney and his daughter, Liz, for their fact-free fear-mongering about Gitmo. At a forum on Capitol Hill on Tuesday, a group of more than two dozen retired generals and admirals took on Cheney’s claim that Gitmo should be kept open, and some had harsh words for the former defense secretary. They also had a simple message to President Obama: Stick to your guns and shut down Gitmo as quickly as possible.
“It appears to us that a campaign to ratchet up fear has taken off,” John D. Hutson, a retired Navy rear admiral and former judge advocate general, said ahead of the forum, which was organized by Human Rights First, a New York-based advocacy group. Added Hutson: “We believe the people going to be prosecuted are not warriors. They are criminals and thugs. . . . We ought to be using the criminal justice system.” The Obama administration has been reviewing the files of the 223 detainees who remain at Guantanamo Bay, but Congress is weighing amendments to legislation that would block transferring any of them to the United States for trial. Various administration officials have hinted that they may not be able to make their own January deadline for the facility’s closure.
Hutson was particularly dismissive of the bipartisan opposition on Capitol Hill toward closing the military prison. “We’re trying to encourage more responsible leadership on this issue,” he said. “But some don’t want to hear it. They seem more comfortable with the politics of fear.”
The Cheney thesis that moving Gitmo prisoners to maximum security facilities in the United States, from which no one has ever escaped, would put the country at risk, is a real test of the capacity of the American media to absorb idiocies. It also serves to highlight the spinelessness of many Democrats on Capitol Hill, who quake in the face of such absurdities when they should be laughing.
The generals are right on another point: the Obama administration should move swiftly to bring criminal charges against those who committed serious crimes, prove their cases, and secure convictions. On this point at least the Obama Team seems to be paying attention. As Karen Greenberg and Francesca Laguardia note, they are in fact securing convictions in cases that languished during the Bush years. All this supports the conclusion that for the Bushies, holding prisoners without charges in Gitmo was all about domestic politics and political crowd control. Real national security concerns played little role in their calculus, and justice none whatsoever.
Watch former Defense Intelligence Agency head General Harry Soyster and former Navy Judge Advocate General John Hutson discuss the issue with MSNBC’s Chris Matthews:
More from Scott Horton:
Six Questions — October 18, 2014, 8:00 pm
Nathaniel Raymond on CIA interrogation techniques.
I recently spent a semester teaching writing at an elite liberal-arts college. At strategic points around the campus, in shades of yellow and green, banners displayed the following pair of texts. The first was attributed to the college’s founder, which dates it to the 1920s. The second was extracted from the latest version of the institution’s mission statement:
The paramount obligation of a college is to develop in its students the ability to think clearly and independently, and the ability to live confidently, courageously, and hopefully.
Let us take a moment to compare these texts. The first thing to observe about the older one is that it is a sentence. It expresses an idea by placing concepts in relation to one another within the kind of structure that we call a syntax. It is, moreover, highly wrought: a parallel structure underscored by repetition, five adverbs balanced two against three.
Percentage of Britons who cannot name the city that provides the setting for the musical Chicago:
An Australian entrepreneur was selling oysters raised in tanks laced with Viagra.
A naked man believed to be under the influence of LSD rammed his pickup truck into two police cars.
Subscribe to the Weekly Review newsletter. Don’t worry, we won’t sell your email address!
“Shelby is waiting for something. He himself does not know what it is. When it comes he will either go back into the world from which he came, or sink out of sight in the morass of alcoholism or despair that has engulfed other vagrants.”