SIGN IN to access Harper’s Magazine
1. Sign in to Customer Care using your account number or postal address.
2. Select Email/Password Information.
3. Enter your new information and click on Save My Changes.
Subscribers can find additional help here. Not a subscriber? Subscribe today!
We recently witnessed Secretary of State Hillary Clinton telling Chinese leaders that their country’s human rights record was of little concern to the United States. Now over the weekend we’ve had the Obama administration effectively embrace the military coup in Honduras, in opposition to every country in Latin America (other than two American-sponsored Banana Republics).
Meanwhile, Teodoro Obiang, the dictator of oil-rich Equatorial Guinea since 1979, has announced that he won a weekend balloting for president with 96.7 percent of the vote. That’s actually down from the 97.1 percent of the vote that he won during the last election in 2002. At this rate, Obiang will lose an absolute majority in the year 2828, which the Obama administration will no doubt cite as progress.
It’s increasingly hard to tell how Obama’s foreign policy differs in substance from that of George W. Bush. If the latter hadn’t already copyrighted the Orwellian term “Freedom Agenda” for his foreign policy, Obama could use it for his own.
More from Ken Silverstein:
Commentary — November 17, 2015, 6:41 pm
The Clintons’ so-called charitable enterprise has served as a vehicle to launder money and to enrich family friends.
Estimated number of people who watched a live Webcast of a hair transplant last fall:
A rancher in Texas was developing a system that will permit hunters to kill animals by remote control via a website.
A man in Japan was arrested for stealing a prospective employer’s wallet during a job interview, and a court in Germany ruled that it is safe for a woman with breast implants to be a police officer.
Subscribe to the Weekly Review newsletter. Don’t worry, we won’t sell your email address!
"It is an interesting and somewhat macabre parlor game to play at a large gathering of one’s acquaintances: to speculate who in a showdown would go Nazi. By now, I think I know. I have gone through the experience many times—in Germany, in Austria, and in France. I have come to know the types: the born Nazis, the Nazis whom democracy itself has created, the certain-to-be fellow-travelers. And I also know those who never, under any conceivable circumstances, would become Nazis."