<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:util="http://harpers.org/subjects/org.harpers.util.Util"
     version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Harper's Magazine</title>
      <link>http://harpers.org/rss/index.xml</link>
      <description>Harper's Magazine: Founded June 1850.</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright Harper's Magazine</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:08:45 -0400</lastBuildDate>
      
      <item>
         <title>Links</title>
         <link>http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006506</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006506</guid>
         <author/>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:08:33 -0400</pubDate>
         <description> . . . 
                             </description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title> SCOTT HORTON—Sullivan on Gitmo “Suicides”</title>
         <link>http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006505</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006505</guid>
         <author> Scott Horton</author>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 11:18:36 -0400</pubDate>
         <description>Andrew Sullivan addresses “The Guantánamo ‘Suicides’” in the Sunday Times: . . . 
                             </description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title> SCOTT HORTON—Talking with the Enemy</title>
         <link>http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006504</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006504</guid>
         <author> Scott Horton</author>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 10:51:40 -0400</pubDate>
         <description>One of the great bugaboos of the Bush era was the notion of talking with the enemy. Once a group was defined as an enemy, even the mildest hint of a contact would meet with torrents of indignation. When the definition of the “enemy” went into soft focus, as various parties that might or might not have some ties to Al Qaeda were added, this approach was particularly troublesome. It made it difficult to divide and conquer—to peel off groups on the periphery in order to make the foe weaker and less stable. During the campaign, Barack Obama articulated this fairly obvious critique of Bush-era “War on Terror” policy, and his administration seemed set to pursue a more subtle approach. Talking with the enemy might be on the agenda. . . . 
                             </description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Pushkin—Winter’s Morning</title>
         <link>http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006458</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006458</guid>
         <author/>
         <pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 07:06:03 -0400</pubDate>
         <description>Мороз и солнце; день чудесный!   &#8232;
Еще ты дремлешь, друг прелестный,    &#8232;
Пора, красавица, проснись:    &#8232;
Отркрой сомкнуты негой взоры    &#8232;
Навстречу северной Авроры,    &#8232;
Звездою севера явись!
Вечор, ты помнишь, вьюга злилась,    &#8232;
На мутном небе мгла носилась;    &#8232;
Луна, как бледное пятно,    &#8232;
Сквозь тучи мрачные желтела,    &#8232;
И ты печальная сидела—   &#8232;
А нынче… погляди в окно: . . . 
                             </description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Tolstoy—The Renunciation of Violence</title>
         <link>http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006460</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006460</guid>
         <author/>
         <pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 07:56:56 -0400</pubDate>
         <description>The longer I live–especially now when I clearly feel the approach of death–the more I feel moved to express what I feel more strongly than anything else, and what in my opinion is of immense importance, namely, what we call the renunciation of all opposition by force, which really simply means the doctrine of the law of love unperverted by sophistries. Love, or in other words the striving of men’s souls towards unity and the submissive behaviour to one another that results therefrom, represents the highest and indeed the only law of life, as every man knows and feels in the depths of his heart (and as we see most clearly in children), and knows until he becomes involved in the lying net of worldly thoughts. This law was announced by all the philosophies–Indian as well as Chinese, and Jewish, Greek and Roman. Most clearly, I think, was it announced by Christ, who said explicitly that on it hang all the Law and the Prophets. More than that, foreseeing the distortion that has hindered its recognition and may always hinder it, he specially indicated the danger of a misrepresentation that presents itself to men living by worldly interests–namely, that they may claim a right to defend their interests by force or, as he expressed it, to repay blow by blow and recover stolen property by force, etc., etc. He knew, as all reasonable men must do, that any employment of force is incompatible with love as the highest law of life, and that as soon as the use of force appears permissible even in a single case, the law itself is immediately negatived. The whole of Christian civilization, outwardly so splendid, has grown up on this strange and flagrant–partly intentional but chiefly unconscious–misunderstanding and contradiction. At bottom, however, the law of love is, and can be, no longer valid if defence by force is set up beside it. And if once the law of love is not valid, then there remains no law except the right of might. In that state Christendom has lived for 1,900 years. Certainly men have always let themselves be guided by force as the main principle of their social order. The difference between the Christian and all other nations is only this: that in Christianity the law of love had been more clearly and definitely given than in any other religion, and that its adherents solemnly recognized it. Yet despite this they deemed the use of force to be permissible, and based their lives on violence–so that the life of the Christian nations presents a greater contradiction between what they believe and the principle on which their lives are built: a contradiction between love which should pre scribe the law of conduct, and the employment of force, recognized under various forms–such as governments, courts of justice, and armies, which are accepted as necessary and esteemed. This contradiction increased with the development of the spiritual life of Christianity and in recent years has reached the utmost tension. . . . 
                             </description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Love: A Rebuke, A Valentine’s Day Reading (February 10)</title>
         <link>http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006491</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006491</guid>
         <author/>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 20:14:20 -0400</pubDate>
         <description> . . . 
                             </description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Links</title>
         <link>http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006493</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006493</guid>
         <author/>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 20:12:40 -0400</pubDate>
         <description> . . . 
                             </description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title> SCOTT HORTON—Trouble in North Korea</title>
         <link>http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006487</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006487</guid>
         <author> Scott Horton</author>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:15:56 -0400</pubDate>
         <description>No wannabe totalitarian regime in the world is quite so ripe for ridicule as North Korea.  I traveled there some years back and marveled over the Ryugyong Hotel, a 105-story monstrosity nicknamed the “hotel of doom.”  Due to gross design and construction flaws, it’s sat unoccupied in downtown Pyongyang for two decades. It captures the regime perfectly: monolithic and impressive from a distance, laughable up close and fundamentally unhinged in concept, it teeters there awaiting the day when it is inevitably imploded to make space for something better attuned to reality. . . . 
                             </description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title> SCOTT HORTON—Holder on Trial</title>
         <link>http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006490</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006490</guid>
         <author> Scott Horton</author>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:58:59 -0400</pubDate>
         <description>Jane Mayer’s feature on Attorney General Eric Holder is just up at the New Yorker website. She presents Holder as at the center of the controversy surrounding counterterrorism policy, under attack from Republicans close to Dick Cheney and relating with difficulty to a White House intent on appeasing Republican critics. Here’s a sample: . . . 
                             </description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title> SCOTT HORTON—DOD Contradicts DOD: Seton Hall responds</title>
         <link>http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006486</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006486</guid>
         <author> Scott Horton</author>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:51:31 -0400</pubDate>
         <description>Of special interest is the way Seton Hall meticulously unpacks the DOD claim about the “100 interviews” that supposedly refute the testimony in Harper’s Magazine. First, the timing is wrong: . . . 
                             </description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>MR. FISH—A Cartoon</title>
         <link>http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006489</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006489</guid>
         <author>Mr. Fish</author>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 11:27:01 -0400</pubDate>
         <description/>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title> BEN AUSTEN—End of the road: 
             After Detroit, the wreck of an American dream</title>
         <link>http://harpers.org/archive/2009/08/0082595</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://harpers.org/archive/2009/08/0082595</guid>
         <author> Ben Austen</author>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 11:25:59 -0400</pubDate>
         <description>Bill Londrigan was a researcher with the AFL-CIO’s building-trades division when, in 1986, Toyota broke ground for its first fully owned U.S. assembly plant, on a tract of Kentucky farmland twelve miles north of Lexington. Honda and Nissan had recently opened their own non-union facilities in the United States, and organized labor feared the consequences of losing further ground in the auto industry. Londrigan was part of the contingent sent from Washington to prevail upon Toyota to hire union builders; he ended up staying on in the Bluegrass Region, and in 1999 he was elected president of Kentucky’s AFL-CIO. When I visited Londrigan late last winter at the union’s state offices—two rooms in a storefront three miles from downtown Frankfort—he flipped across his desk a booklet that he had prepared for the battle with Toyota two decades earlier. The pamphlet detailed the scope of the vertically integrated supply chains, called keiretsu, that Japanese car companies had brought with them to America from Japan and that some believe violate U.S. antitrust laws. On its cover was a black dragon hovering ominously above the middle United States. Londrigan guided me to a specific passage and then began to read it aloud. “The euphoric welcome Japanese keiretsu factories receive when they announce their locations in American towns and counties is reminiscent of the Trojans’ joy when they first viewed the Trojan Horse. The historical warning that sad episode produced—‘Beware of Greeks bearing gifts’—seems to be lost on this generation of Americans, or has at least escaped the attention of U.S. economic development officials.” . . . 
                             </description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title> SCOTT HORTON—Six Questions for Dr. Michael Baden: The Guantánamo autopsies</title>
         <link>http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006466</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006466</guid>
         <author> Scott Horton</author>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 16:12:19 -0400</pubDate>
         <description>2. Do deaths in the context of confinement in prison raise any special concerns for a medical examiner conducting an autopsy? . . . 
                             </description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title> SCOTT HORTON—Hersh in Syria</title>
         <link>http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006485</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006485</guid>
         <author> Scott Horton</author>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 13:12:00 -0400</pubDate>
         <description>I continue to think that Syria might yet offer a platform for some fairly modest foreign policy advances for the Obama Administration in the Middle East.  But that’s far from certain. Seymour Hersh offers some fascinating snippets from a long conversation with Syrian President Bashar Assad, including this one: . . . 
                             </description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title> KEN SILVERSTEIN—Senate report details stretch Hummers, skirt-chasing attorneys, shrink-wrapped cash!</title>
         <link>http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006483</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006483</guid>
         <author> Ken Silverstein</author>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 11:47:34 -0400</pubDate>
         <description>The senate is holding hearings and issuing a report today that shows how a number of corrupt African officials — and their American enablers — used the U.S. banking systems to launder vast amounts of money. A good chunk of the report builds on revelations made here last November about Teodoro Nguema Obiang Mangue, son of the dictator of oil-rich Equatorial Guinea. . . . 
                             </description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title> KEN SILVERSTEIN—In Aftermath of Court Ruling, McCain Facing Tough Re-election Challenge</title>
         <link>http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006482</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006482</guid>
         <author> Ken Silverstein</author>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 11:45:10 -0400</pubDate>
         <description>From The Onion: . . . 
                             </description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title> SCOTT HORTON—The Holder-McConnell Letter</title>
         <link>http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006481</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006481</guid>
         <author> Scott Horton</author>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 11:12:01 -0400</pubDate>
         <description>The American political landscape is heavily populated with fake debates—hot-button issues designed to rile people up, but which are not likely to have any real impact on policy.  One of the best examples of this in modern times is the fake rage over trying terrorists in federal courts and the procedures that followed the arrest of the “panty-bomber” Abdulmutallab.  The simple fact is that the policies of the Bush and Obama Administrations have been essentially indistinguishable, and the rhetorical war is little more than political demagoguery. . . . 
                             </description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Links</title>
         <link>http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006480</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006480</guid>
         <author/>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:33:17 -0400</pubDate>
         <description> . . . 
                             </description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title> KEN SILVERSTEIN—Bottoms Up: Lobbyists win big for foreign rum maker</title>
         <link>http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006478</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006478</guid>
         <author> Ken Silverstein</author>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:47:41 -0400</pubDate>
         <description>From ProPublica: . . . 
                             </description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title> KEN SILVERSTEIN—Congressman Issa’s Joke: Dictatorship in Kazakhstan, and Washington D.C.</title>
         <link>http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006477</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006477</guid>
         <author> Ken Silverstein</author>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:39:22 -0400</pubDate>
         <description>A bizarre congressional hearing yesterday, as Kazakhstan’s Foreign Minister, Kanat Saudabayev, testified before the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe, which is co-chaired by Congressmen Benjamin Cardin and Alcee Hastings. The Kazakh government is forever trying to give the impression that President Nursultan Nazarbaev is keen on democratic reforms, even though human rights groups and the media find no evidence to support that. “Rather than loosen its hold on media, internet is being increasingly censored,” Peter Zalmayev of the Eurasia Democracy Initiative told me. “Rather than cooperate with civil society to improve its laws, the government continues to throw its critics in prison.” . . . 
                             </description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Midnight cowpoke</title>
         <link>http://harpers.org/archive/2009/12/0082747</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://harpers.org/archive/2009/12/0082747</guid>
         <author/>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:10:52 -0400</pubDate>
         <description>From September 23 proceedings in the case of Robert Melia, a police officer from Moorestown, New Jersey, who was videotaped engaging in sexual acts with calves in Southampton, New Jersey, in 2006. In 2008, Melia was arrested and charged with sexually assaulting three girls over a period of five years; he was also charged with animal cruelty for the 2006 incident. Mark Catanzaro is the lawyer for the defense; Kevin Morgan is an assistant prosecutor for Burlington County. Superior Court Judge James Morley dismissed the animal-cruelty charge. . . . 
                             </description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title> SCOTT HORTON—The Cost of Conscience: The hidden challenges of dissent in the workplace</title>
         <link>http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006476</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006476</guid>
         <author> Scott Horton</author>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:25:09 -0400</pubDate>
         <description>
Location: Center for American Progress, Washington, D.C.
Event Date: February 11, 2010
Event Time: 5:30–7:30 p.m.
Speakers: Matthew Alexander, Richard Cizik, Elizabeth MacKenzie Biedell, Morton H. Halperin, Scott Horton . . . 
                             </description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title> SCOTT HORTON—Six Questions for Rachid Mesli: The missing throats</title>
         <link>http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006471</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006471</guid>
         <author> Scott Horton</author>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 10:31:50 -0400</pubDate>
         <description>2. What specific arrangements were made for a secondary autopsy? Was the body sent directly there by the Americans, or was it transferred from Yemen first? . . . 
                             </description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Links</title>
         <link>http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006468</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006468</guid>
         <author/>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:00:10 -0400</pubDate>
         <description> . . . 
                             </description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title> SCOTT HORTON—Deconfliction</title>
         <link>http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006465</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006465</guid>
         <author> Scott Horton</author>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:27:34 -0400</pubDate>
         <description>This segment from CBS’s The Agency dramatizes the crossed wires that result from “stovepiping” national security operations, in which undercover agents from multiple agencies work to identify potential terrorists: . . . 
                             </description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title> RAFE BARTHOLOMEW—Weekly Review</title>
         <link>http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/WeeklyReview2010-02-02</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/WeeklyReview2010-02-02</guid>
         <author> Rafe Bartholomew</author>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
         <description>

            President Barack Obama skipped jury duty to deliver his first State of the Union address. In the 70-minute speech, Obama blamed Republicans for “saying no to everything,” Democratic leaders in Congress for “horse-trading,” and the Supreme Court for a recent decision that will allow elections to be “bankrolled by special interests.” Justice Samuel Alito shook his head and mouthed the words “not true.” Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dozed. Obama also criticized banks, lobbyists, his own political strategy, and, indirectly, root canals; an objection from the American Society of Endodontists was duly noted. The president announced that leftover stimulus money would generate 1.5 million new jobs for the 15 million out-of-work Americans and called for a new bill to create jobs by giving tax credits to small businesses that hire new workers. He planned to cut the federal deficit with a freeze on domestic spending that, if successful, would reduce the United States' expected shortfall by less than 3 percent over the next ten years. Thirty-two minutes into the address, Obama reiterated his commitment to health-care reform. He also said he wanted to end the Iraq war. “Make no mistake,” he said. “All of our troops are coming home.” He also committed 30,000 additional troops to Afghanistan for December. MSNBC host Chris Matthews was impressed: “I forgot he was black tonight,” he said.
               New York Times
            
            
               New York Times
            
            
               Washington Post
            
            
               UPI
            
            
               Bureau of Labor Statistics
            
            
               New York Times
            
            
               New York Times
            
            
               New York Times
            
            
               New York Times
            
            
               MSNBC
            

Earlier in the week, Obama met with Magic Johnson. “He was the only man on earth that ever trash-talked me and I [didn’t] say anything,” said Johnson. “It was a great moment.”
               ESPN
            



          . . . 
                             </description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title> RENATA ADLER—A court of no appeal: 
             How one obscure sentence upset the New York Times</title>
         <link>http://harpers.org/archive/2000/08/0066912</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://harpers.org/archive/2000/08/0066912</guid>
         <author> Renata Adler</author>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 12:30:30 -0400</pubDate>
         <description>In January of this year [2000], Simon &amp; Schuster published my book Gone: The Last Days of The New Yorker. I had been at The New Yorker since 1963–with an absence of about fourteen months, during which I was Bosley Crowther’s successor as the film critic of the New York Times. Although I had written for other publications, I thought I knew the magazine pretty well. The New Yorker, I wrote, is dead. I did not expect everyone to agree or to welcome my account of what happened to the magazine. Perhaps not surprisingly, the colleagues whom I had loved and admired through the years tended to share my views. Those of whom I thought less highly, and whom I portrayed less admiringly, did not. . . . 
                             </description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title> SCOTT HORTON—Margolis Moves to Exonerate Yoo and Bybee, as Criminal Investigation Opens in Spain</title>
         <link>http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006456</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006456</guid>
         <author> Scott Horton</author>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 11:14:15 -0400</pubDate>
         <description>Three developments last week show the growing gap between the Obama Administration and its NATO allies with respect to the legacy of torture from the Bush era. They also demonstrate that, contrary to Obama’s promises faithfully to uphold the Convention Against Torture and Geneva Conventions, his Justice Department has no intention of doing so when crimes from the Bush era are in question. This attitude is not going over well with key allies. . . . 
                             </description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title> KEN SILVERSTEIN—Where Art Thou, Esme?</title>
         <link>http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006464</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006464</guid>
         <author> Ken Silverstein</author>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:18:00 -0400</pubDate>
         <description>From Politics Daily: . . . 
                             </description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title> KEN SILVERSTEIN—Stop The Presses (no starch)!: Cosmo skewers the senate</title>
         <link>http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006463</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://harpers.org/archive/2010/02/hbc-90006463</guid>
         <author> Ken Silverstein</author>
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:14:04 -0400</pubDate>
         <description>“The treason of the Senate! Treason is a strong word, but not too strong, rather too weak to characterize the situation in which the Senate is the eager, resourceful, indefatigable agent of interests as hostile to the American people as any invading army could be, and vastly more dangerous; interests that manipulate the prosperity produced by all, so that it heaps up riches for the few.” . . . 
                             </description>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>