Get Access to Print and Digital for $23.99 per year.
Subscribe for Full Access
[Washington Babylon]

Good News for Freedom Agenda: Pro-American dictator not a cannibal

Adjust

For years it has been rumored that Brigadier General Teodoro Obiang, the long-time dictator of oil-rich Equatorial Guinea, is a cannibal. “In similar fashion to Idi Amin, Obiang has also allowed rumours that he is a cannibal to circulate,” Wikipedia says in discussing the rumors. “Many testimonies of former residents of Equatorial Guinea…indicate that cannibalism had been applied as a tool of warfare.”

The allegations have not been proven and some of the charges may be politically motivated. For example, Severo Moto Nsa, an exiled opposition leader who was accused of plotting a 2004 coup against Obiang, once claimed that the dictator had “devoured a police commissioner” who was “buried without his testicles and brain.” Such reports are said to have led the rapper Eve to end a romance with Obiang’s son.

Now, London’s Daily Mail has weighed in on behalf of Obiang, whose regime has won strong support from the Bush administration and American oil companies (like ExxonMobil) that have billions invested in Equatorial Guinea. In a new piece about the 2004 coup, the tabloid has this wonderful line: “[The prisoner] was led to a chair in front of the dock and directly behind him, the face of President Obiang – who has been accused, without foundation, of cannibalism – glowered at him from a framed photograph hanging on the wall.”

Obiang’s exoneration as a flesh eater clearly marks a major victory for President Bush’s Freedom Agenda. Now, the only remaining human rights issues left to be addressed in Equatorial Guinea are “abridgement of citizens’ right to change their government; instances of physical abuse of prisoners and detainees by security forces; poor conditions in prisons and detention facilities; impunity; arbitrary arrest, detention, and incommunicado detention; harassment and deportation of foreign residents with limited due process; judicial corruption and lack of due process; restrictions on the right to privacy; restrictions on freedom of speech and of the press; restrictions on the right of assembly, association, and movement; government corruption; violence and discrimination against women; suspected trafficking in persons; discrimination against ethnic minorities; and restrictions on labor rights.”

More
Close
“An unexpectedly excellent magazine that stands out amid a homogenized media landscape.” —the New York Times
Subscribe now

Debug