No Comment — October 24, 2007, 11:12 am

Another Conflicted Prosecutor in the Siegelman Case

In its (as usual) tortured reporting on the Siegelman case, today’s Birmingham News unwittingly opens the door on another chapter in this saga. Here’s the key passage:

During the hearing, Davis also mentioned a recent Time magazine story that says investigators were told in 2002 about illegal campaign contributions to Republicans Jeff Sessions and Bill Pryor, but chose not to pursue the allegations. Davis called it proof of “selectiveness” on whom to prosecute.

But Julia Weller, a former assistant U.S. attorney who worked on the case then, said they found no “quid pro quo,” or evidence to show the Republicans knew about the alleged donations or did anything in exchange for them. “We did follow up on it,” Weller said.

So here’s another prosecutor produced, deus ex machina, to establish the bona fides of the work of Leura Canary’s shop in Montgomery. The News as usual only barely hints at the allegations which were raised in Adam Zagorin’s article in Time, which detailed Lanny Young’s allegations of bribery and money laundering against Senator Jeff Sessions and then-Attorney General William Pryor. But note who steps forward to bat them down? Julia Weller.

Note how the Birmingham News tells you nothing about Ms. Weller or who she is. Ms. Weller is now an administrative law judge, appointment courtesy of Attorney General Troy King, who found a spot for her when she left the U.S. Attorney’s office “to spend more time with her family,” the exact same explanation given by Karl Rove and Alberto Gonzales for their departures. Before that she was brought into the U.S. Attorney’s office by Leura Canary as Canary’s first assistant, and Canary put her in charge of the Siegelman case, where one of her responsibilities included dealing with the Lanny Young statements.

Weller and Canary were college friends and are said by mutual acquaintances to have had a deep and long personal friendship, which explains why Canary brought Weller aboard when she became U.S. Attorney and why she gave Weller the top staff position in her office, and why she put Weller in charge of the highest profile and most sensitive case. That’s enough to raise eyebrows already. (Of course, Leura Canary “recused herself,” the News would say).

But that barely scratches the surface. Weller and Canary were linked by other things, starting with Alabama Republican politics. Both had husbands who were deeply involved in Alabama G.O.P. politics: Bill Canary, who heads the Business Council of Alabama, is a close friend of Karl Rove’s and was involved deeply in advising and managing political campaigns. And among Canary’s key clients were Jefferson Beauregard Sessions and William Pryor (indeed, let’s not forget who managed Pryor’s 1998 campaign: Karl Rove).

Weller is married to a well-known Montgomery tax attorney named Christopher William Weller at the law firm of Capell & Howard. Her husband was described to me by several Montgomery lawyers as “William Pryor’s closest confidant and advisor.” Said one, “Bill Pryor doesn’t make a move without consulting Weller. They’re soulmates, and Weller is his attorney.” Indeed, Weller loudly touts his connections to Pryor on the firm’s bio web page. Apparently Weller is tight with Jeff Sessions as well, which is unsurprising since Sessions was Pryor’s mentor and booster, and the two have had a closely-aligned career trajectory.

Other members of the Montgomery legal community tell me that Weller is not only known for his relationship with Pryor and Sessions, but also with Karl Rove. Said one: “I’ve heard that Rove uses Capell & Howard’s conference rooms when he spends some time in Montgomery, which makes sense, since they’ve been close with the Pryor and Sessions campaigns and he’s played a role in them.”

Now let’s go back and plug in this information. The “former prosecutor” who is trotted out to tell us that Leura Canary’s shop handled proper procedures in looking into the allegations against Pryor and Sessions is the wife of Pryor’s attorney and a key figure in the Pryor and Sessions campaigns. So how, from the simple perspective of prosecutorial ethics—which are very clear on this point—does she even come to be involved in the matter?

This is further extremely strong evidence of gross impropriety in the way the Montgomery U.S. Attorney’s office operates generally, and particularly of its politically motivated prosecution of former Governor Siegelman.

As usual, the most important facts in an account in the Birmingham News are the ones they don’t report.

Share
Single Page

More from Scott Horton:

Conversation August 5, 2016, 12:08 pm

Lincoln’s Party

Sidney Blumenthal on the origins of the Republican Party, the fallout from Clinton’s emails, and his new biography of Abraham Lincoln

Conversation March 30, 2016, 3:44 pm

Burn Pits

Joseph Hickman discusses his new book, The Burn Pits, which tells the story of thousands of U.S. soldiers who, after returning from Iraq and Afghanistan, have developed rare cancers and respiratory diseases.

Context, No Comment August 28, 2015, 12:16 pm

Beltway Secrecy

In five easy lessons

Get access to 167 years of
Harper’s for only $45.99

United States Canada

CATEGORIES

THE CURRENT ISSUE

December 2017

Document of Barbarism

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Destroyer of Worlds

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Crossing Guards

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

“I am Here Only for Working”

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Dear Rose

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

The Year of The Frog

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

view Table Content

FEATURED ON HARPERS.ORG

Article
Destroyer of Worlds·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

In February 1947, Harper’s Magazine published Henry L. Stimson’s “The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb.” As secretary of war, Stimson had served as the chief military adviser to President Truman, and recommended the attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The terms of his unrepentant apologia, an excerpt of which appears on page 35, are now familiar to us: the risk of a dud made a demonstration too risky; the human cost of a land invasion would be too high; nothing short of the bomb’s awesome lethality would compel Japan to surrender. The bomb was the only option. Seventy years later, we find his reasoning unconvincing. Entirely aside from the destruction of the blasts themselves, the decision thrust the world irrevocably into a high-stakes arms race — in which, as Stimson took care to warn, the technology would proliferate, evolve, and quite possibly lead to the end of modern civilization. The first half of that forecast has long since come to pass, and the second feels as plausible as ever. Increasingly, the atmosphere seems to reflect the anxious days of the Cold War, albeit with more juvenile insults and more colorful threats. Terms once consigned to the history books — “madman theory,” “brinkmanship” — have returned to the news cycle with frightening regularity. In the pages that follow, seven writers and experts survey the current nuclear landscape. Our hope is to call attention to the bomb’s ever-present menace and point our way toward a world in which it finally ceases to exist.

Illustration by Darrel Rees. Source photographs: Kim Jong-un © ITAR-TASS Photo Agency/Alamy Stock Photo; Donald Trump © Yuri Gripas/Reuters/Newscom
Article
Crossing Guards·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

The Ambassador Bridge arcs over the Detroit River, connecting Detroit to Windsor, Ontario, the southernmost city in Canada. Driving in from the Canadian side, where I grew up, is like viewing a panorama of the Motor City’s rise and fall, visible on either side of the bridge’s turquoise steel stanchions. On the right are the tubular glass towers of the Renaissance Center, headquarters of General Motors, and Michigan Central Station, the rail terminal that closed in 1988. On the left is a rusted industrial corridor — fuel tanks, docks, abandoned warehouses. I have taken this route all my life, but one morning this spring, I crossed for the first time in a truck.

Illustration by Richard Mia
Article
“I am Here Only for Working”·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

But the exercise of labor is the worker’s own life-activity, the manifestation of his own life. . . . He works in order to live. He does not even reckon labor as part of his life, it is rather a sacrifice of his life.

— Karl Marx

Photograph from the United Arab Emirates by the author. This page: Ruwais Mall
Article
The Year of The Frog·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

To look at him, Sweet Macho was a beautiful horse, lean and strong with muscles that twitched beneath his shining black coat. A former racehorse, he carried himself with ceremony, prancing the field behind our house as though it were the winner’s circle. When he approached us that day at the edge of the yard, his eyes shone with what might’ve looked like intelligence but was actually a form of insanity. Not that there was any telling our mother’s boyfriend this — he fancied himself a cowboy.

“Horse 1,” by Nine Francois. Courtesy the artist and AgavePrint, Austin, Texas
Article
Dead Ball Situation·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

What We Think About When We Think About Soccer, by Simon Critchley. Penguin Books. 224 pages. $20.

Begin, as Wallace Stevens didn’t quite say, with the idea of it. I so like the idea of Simon Critchley, whose books offer philosophical takes on a variety of subjects: Stevens, David Bowie, suicide, humor, and now football — or soccer, as the US edition has it. (As a matter of principle I shall refer to this sport throughout as football.) “All of us are mysteriously affected by our names,” decides one of Milan Kundera’s characters in Immortality, and I like Critchley because his name would seem to have put him at a vocational disadvantage compared with Martin Heidegger, Søren Kierkegaard, or even, in the Anglophone world, A. J. Ayer or Richard Rorty. (How different philosophy might look today if someone called Nobby Stiles had been appointed as the Wykeham Professor of Logic.)

Tostão, No. 9, and Pelé, No. 10, celebrate Carlos Alberto’s final goal for Brazil in the World Cup final against Italy on June 21, 1970, Mexico City © Heidtmann/picture-alliance/dpa/AP Images

Factor by which single Americans who use emoji are more likely than other single Americans to be sexually active:

1.85

Brontosaurus was restored as a genus, and cannibalism was reported in tyrannosaurine dinosaurs.

Moore said he did not “generally” date teenage girls, and it was reported that in the 1970s Moore had been banned from his local mall and YMCA for bothering teenage girls.

Subscribe to the Weekly Review newsletter. Don’t worry, we won’t sell your email address!

HARPER’S FINEST

Report — From the June 2013 issue

How to Make Your Own AR-15

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

By

"Gun owners have long been the hypochondriacs of American politics. Over the past twenty years, the gun-rights movement has won just about every battle it has fought; states have passed at least a hundred laws loosening gun restrictions since President Obama took office. Yet the National Rifle Association has continued to insist that government confiscation of privately owned firearms is nigh. The NRA’s alarmism helped maintain an active membership, but the strategy was risky: sooner or later, gun guys might have realized that they’d been had. Then came the shootings at a movie theater in Aurora, Colorado, and at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, followed swiftly by the nightmare the NRA had been promising for decades: a dedicated push at every level of government for new gun laws. The gun-rights movement was now that most insufferable of species: a hypochondriac taken suddenly, seriously ill."

Subscribe Today