No Comment — October 24, 2007, 11:12 am

Another Conflicted Prosecutor in the Siegelman Case

In its (as usual) tortured reporting on the Siegelman case, today’s Birmingham News unwittingly opens the door on another chapter in this saga. Here’s the key passage:

During the hearing, Davis also mentioned a recent Time magazine story that says investigators were told in 2002 about illegal campaign contributions to Republicans Jeff Sessions and Bill Pryor, but chose not to pursue the allegations. Davis called it proof of “selectiveness” on whom to prosecute.

But Julia Weller, a former assistant U.S. attorney who worked on the case then, said they found no “quid pro quo,” or evidence to show the Republicans knew about the alleged donations or did anything in exchange for them. “We did follow up on it,” Weller said.

So here’s another prosecutor produced, deus ex machina, to establish the bona fides of the work of Leura Canary’s shop in Montgomery. The News as usual only barely hints at the allegations which were raised in Adam Zagorin’s article in Time, which detailed Lanny Young’s allegations of bribery and money laundering against Senator Jeff Sessions and then-Attorney General William Pryor. But note who steps forward to bat them down? Julia Weller.

Note how the Birmingham News tells you nothing about Ms. Weller or who she is. Ms. Weller is now an administrative law judge, appointment courtesy of Attorney General Troy King, who found a spot for her when she left the U.S. Attorney’s office “to spend more time with her family,” the exact same explanation given by Karl Rove and Alberto Gonzales for their departures. Before that she was brought into the U.S. Attorney’s office by Leura Canary as Canary’s first assistant, and Canary put her in charge of the Siegelman case, where one of her responsibilities included dealing with the Lanny Young statements.

Weller and Canary were college friends and are said by mutual acquaintances to have had a deep and long personal friendship, which explains why Canary brought Weller aboard when she became U.S. Attorney and why she gave Weller the top staff position in her office, and why she put Weller in charge of the highest profile and most sensitive case. That’s enough to raise eyebrows already. (Of course, Leura Canary “recused herself,” the News would say).

But that barely scratches the surface. Weller and Canary were linked by other things, starting with Alabama Republican politics. Both had husbands who were deeply involved in Alabama G.O.P. politics: Bill Canary, who heads the Business Council of Alabama, is a close friend of Karl Rove’s and was involved deeply in advising and managing political campaigns. And among Canary’s key clients were Jefferson Beauregard Sessions and William Pryor (indeed, let’s not forget who managed Pryor’s 1998 campaign: Karl Rove).

Weller is married to a well-known Montgomery tax attorney named Christopher William Weller at the law firm of Capell & Howard. Her husband was described to me by several Montgomery lawyers as “William Pryor’s closest confidant and advisor.” Said one, “Bill Pryor doesn’t make a move without consulting Weller. They’re soulmates, and Weller is his attorney.” Indeed, Weller loudly touts his connections to Pryor on the firm’s bio web page. Apparently Weller is tight with Jeff Sessions as well, which is unsurprising since Sessions was Pryor’s mentor and booster, and the two have had a closely-aligned career trajectory.

Other members of the Montgomery legal community tell me that Weller is not only known for his relationship with Pryor and Sessions, but also with Karl Rove. Said one: “I’ve heard that Rove uses Capell & Howard’s conference rooms when he spends some time in Montgomery, which makes sense, since they’ve been close with the Pryor and Sessions campaigns and he’s played a role in them.”

Now let’s go back and plug in this information. The “former prosecutor” who is trotted out to tell us that Leura Canary’s shop handled proper procedures in looking into the allegations against Pryor and Sessions is the wife of Pryor’s attorney and a key figure in the Pryor and Sessions campaigns. So how, from the simple perspective of prosecutorial ethics—which are very clear on this point—does she even come to be involved in the matter?

This is further extremely strong evidence of gross impropriety in the way the Montgomery U.S. Attorney’s office operates generally, and particularly of its politically motivated prosecution of former Governor Siegelman.

As usual, the most important facts in an account in the Birmingham News are the ones they don’t report.

Share
Single Page

More from Scott Horton:

Conversation August 5, 2016, 12:08 pm

Lincoln’s Party

Sidney Blumenthal on the origins of the Republican Party, the fallout from Clinton’s emails, and his new biography of Abraham Lincoln

Conversation March 30, 2016, 3:44 pm

Burn Pits

Joseph Hickman discusses his new book, The Burn Pits, which tells the story of thousands of U.S. soldiers who, after returning from Iraq and Afghanistan, have developed rare cancers and respiratory diseases.

Context, No Comment August 28, 2015, 12:16 pm

Beltway Secrecy

In five easy lessons

Get access to 167 years of
Harper’s for only $45.99

United States Canada

CATEGORIES

THE CURRENT ISSUE

February 2018

The Bodies in The Forest

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

The Minds of Others

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Modern Despots

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Before the Deluge

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Notes to Self

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Within Reach

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

view Table Content

FEATURED ON HARPERS.ORG

Article
The Minds of Others·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Progress is impossible without change,” George Bernard Shaw wrote in 1944, “and those who cannot change their minds cannot change anything.” But progress through persuasion has never seemed harder to achieve. Political segregation has made many Americans inaccessible, even unimaginable, to those on the other side of the partisan divide. On the rare occasions when we do come face-to-face, it is not clear what we could say to change each other’s minds or reach a worthwhile compromise. Psychological research has shown that humans often fail to process facts that conflict with our preexisting worldviews. The stakes are simply too high: our self-worth and identity are entangled with our beliefs — and with those who share them. The weakness of logic as a tool of persuasion, combined with the urgency of the political moment, can be paralyzing.

Yet we know that people do change their minds. We are constantly molded by our environment and our culture, by the events of the world, by the gossip we hear and the books we read. In the essays that follow, seven writers explore the ways that persuasion operates in our lives, from the intimate to the far-reaching. Some consider the ethics and mechanics of persuasion itself — in religion, politics, and foreign policy — and others turn their attention to the channels through which it acts, such as music, protest, and technology. How, they ask, can we persuade others to join our cause or see things the way we do? And when it comes to our own openness to change, how do we decide when to compromise and when to resist?

Illustration (detail) by Lincoln Agnew
Article
Within Reach·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

On a balmy day last spring, Connor Chase sat on a red couch in the waiting room of a medical clinic in Columbus, Ohio, and watched the traffic on the street. His bleached-blond hair fell into his eyes as he scrolled through his phone to distract himself. Waiting to see Mimi Rivard, a nurse practitioner, was making Chase nervous: it would be the first time he would tell a medical professional that he was transgender.

By the time he arrived at the Equitas Health clinic, Chase was eighteen, and had long since come to dread doctors and hospitals. As a child, he’d had asthma, migraines, two surgeries for a tumor that had caused deafness in one ear, and gangrene from an infected bug bite. Doctors had always assumed he was a girl. After puberty, Chase said, he avoided looking in the mirror because his chest and hips “didn’t feel like my body.” He liked it when strangers saw him as male, but his voice was high-pitched, so he rarely spoke in public. Then, when Chase was fourteen, he watched a video on YouTube in which a twentysomething trans man described taking testosterone to lower his voice and appear more masculine. Suddenly, Chase had an explanation for how he felt — and what he wanted.

Illustration by Taylor Callery
Article
Before the Deluge·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

In the summer of 2016, when Congress installed a financial control board to address Puerto Rico’s crippling debt, I traveled to San Juan, the capital. The island owed some $120 billion, and Wall Street was demanding action. On the news, President Obama announced his appointments to the Junta de Supervisión y Administración Financiera. “The task ahead for Puerto Rico is not an easy one,” he said. “But I am confident Puerto Rico is up to the challenge of stabilizing the fiscal situation, restoring growth, and building a better future for all Puerto Ricans.” Among locals, however, the control board was widely viewed as a transparent effort to satisfy mainland creditors — just the latest tool of colonialist plundering that went back generations.

Photograph from Puerto Rico by Christopher Gregory
Article
Monumental Error·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

In 1899, the art critic Layton Crippen complained in the New York Times that private donors and committees had been permitted to run amok, erecting all across the city a large number of “painfully ugly monuments.” The very worst statues had been dumped in Central Park. “The sculptures go as far toward spoiling the Park as it is possible to spoil it,” he wrote. Even worse, he lamented, no organization had “power of removal” to correct the damage that was being done.

Illustration by Steve Brodner
Post
CamperForce·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

After losing their savings in the stock market crash of 2008, seniors Barb and Chuck find seasonal employment at Amazon fulfillment centers.

Amount Arizona’s Red Feather Lodge offered to pay to reopen the Grand Canyon during the 2013 government shutdown:

$25,000

A Brazilian cat gave birth to a dog.

Trump’s former chief strategist, whom Trump said had “lost his mind,” issued a statement saying that Trump’s son did not commit treason; the US ambassador to the United Nations announced that “no one questions” Trump’s mental stability; and the director of the CIA said that Trump, who requested “killer graphics” in his intelligence briefings, is able to read.

Subscribe to the Weekly Review newsletter. Don’t worry, we won’t sell your email address!

HARPER’S FINEST

Report — From the June 2013 issue

How to Make Your Own AR-15

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

By

"Gun owners have long been the hypochondriacs of American politics. Over the past twenty years, the gun-rights movement has won just about every battle it has fought; states have passed at least a hundred laws loosening gun restrictions since President Obama took office. Yet the National Rifle Association has continued to insist that government confiscation of privately owned firearms is nigh. The NRA’s alarmism helped maintain an active membership, but the strategy was risky: sooner or later, gun guys might have realized that they’d been had. Then came the shootings at a movie theater in Aurora, Colorado, and at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, followed swiftly by the nightmare the NRA had been promising for decades: a dedicated push at every level of government for new gun laws. The gun-rights movement was now that most insufferable of species: a hypochondriac taken suddenly, seriously ill."

Subscribe Today