Easy Chair — From the August 2014 issue

The Octopus and Its Grandchildren

Download Pdf
MicroFiche

When an 1882 cartoon in San Francisco’s Wasp newspaper depicted the Southern Pacific Railroad as an octopus with the whole state of California in its far-reaching tentacles, it launched an image of monopoly power still with us today. Supersize these animals and put people, institutions, and buildings within their reach, and those tentacles become an apt shorthand for the diversified interests of an acquisitive force. Likely inspired by the cartoon, Frank Norris took up the figure for his 1902 muckraking novel about the railroads, The Octopus. A few years later, Standard Oil was similarly represented in an illustration for Punch magazine. The animal had evolved somewhat by 2009, when Matt Taibbi called Goldman Sachs “a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money.”

You’d think all this would give octopuses — as well as vampire squid — a bad name, but it hasn’t as far as technology’s billionaires are concerned. Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen is only the world’s fifty-eighth-richest person at present, but he has the world’s thirteenth-largest private yacht: Octopus. The world’s fifth-richest person, Oracle CEO Larry Ellison, runs most of his fortune through Octopus Holdings LP. Incidentally, Ellison’s Oracle Corporation is, as of April, being sued — not for the first time — as a monopoly-seeking beast. A lawsuit filed by the tech-support company Terix argues that since acquiring Sun Microsystems, “Oracle has pursued a deliberate policy of attempting to eliminate competition in the market for the maintenance and support of computer hardware running the Solaris operating system.” Generally, policing such anticompetitive behavior is the job of the U.S. Justice Department, but it has been notably shy on that front since losing a high-profile antitrust case against Oracle after the company’s 2004 acquisition of the software company PeopleSoft. Many of the biggest tech companies have grown by eating up smaller companies and beating the resultant antitrust suits.

This article is only available to magazine subscribers. If you are a subscriber, please sign in. If you aren't, please subscribe below and get access to the entire Harper's archive for only $39.99/year.

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Download Pdf
Share
is a contributing editor of Harper’s Magazine. Her Easy Chair essay will appear in every other issue.

More from Rebecca Solnit:

Forum From the August 2013 issue

Insomnia

Get access to 164 years of
Harper’s for only $39.99

United States Canada

  • Bob Aho

    It is a canard that tech companies like H1B visa holders because they can be paid less. The DoL can (will) bring suit against the company if the H1B holder is paid less than 90% of the prevailing salary for the position and experience.
    The reason H1B’s are popular is because the company has a hold on the employee. If they cut the sponsorship, the employee must depart within 30 days. Often it is difficult to transfer these visas, so employees are bound to the employer. No fear of employees jumping from one job or another or even threatening to go to another company.
    Giving Solnit such prominent placement is making me regret I renewed my subscription. Oh well, one must accept the good and the bad I guess….

    • wandagb

      Can you cite any such successful lawsuits?

      http://www.cringely.com/2012/10/15/so-sue-us-why-big-companies-like-ibm-arent-afraid-of-h-1b-lawsuits/

      I believe you provide the basis that contradicts your assertion that H-1B visa holders are not hired with cost cutting in mind. As you say, they are bound to their employers; this translate to lower wages over time as they can’t bargain for pay raises nor threaten to leave the company. Also, they are inherently younger than American seasoned workers and cheaper; the real sin of H-1B visas is that they are the cover for age discrimination.
      http://fortune.com/2014/06/19/tech-job-ads-discrimination/

      To believe corporations claim of a STEM shortage is akin to believing GM would never sell an automobile with a known defective part that could kill you.

      • UncleStu

        All these side quibbles about wages and bound employees misdirects attention from the fact that there is no shortage of qualified American programmers. That there is a shortage was, and is, the lie that is the basis for the entire H-1B program.

        He that has the gold makes the rules.

  • mkhunt

    I liked this article so much that I subscribed and do hope to see more similar deep looks at what really is going on and how we got to where we are…in other words journalism!

  • Arjay Cee

    Superb. Your decision to hire Solnit renews my thirty-year faith in the magazine.

THE CURRENT ISSUE

October 2014

Cassandra Among the
Creeps

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

“Today Is Better Than Tomorrow”

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

PBS Self-Destructs

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

The Monkey Did It

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

view Table Content