= Subscribers only. Sign in here. Subscribe here.

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

1955 / August | View All Issues |

August 1955

Letters

4, 6, 8 PDF

Letters·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.


The easy chair

12-13, 16-19 PDF

Spread of an infection·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

[Coming in Harper’s]

24 PDF

[Coming in Harper’s]·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Article

27-33 PDF

The Salk vaccine·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

What caused the mess?

Article

34-36 PDF

The high fidelity wife·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Or, a fate worse than deaf

Article

37-42 PDF

The great assault on the Arctic·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Building the DEW line

Poetry

42 PDF

The middle-aged·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Fiction

43-51 PDF

The kill·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

A story

Article

52-55 PDF

Tight little studio·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Home of the good British movies

Article

56-64 PDF

Women in politics·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Article

65-70 PDF

Mister Rodriguez of Lisbon·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Article

71-76 PDF

When to change jobs–and why·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Article

77-83 PDF

Louisville cashes in on culture·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Article

83 PDF

How to write a love poem, with corporation help·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

After hours

84-86 PDF

Cherokee strip·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

After hours

86-87 PDF

The automatic thank you·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Books in brief

92-93 PDF

Books in brief·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Books in brief

93 PDF

Forecast·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

The new recordings

95 PDF

Worth looking into . . .·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

The new recordings

95-96 PDF

The new recordings·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

The new recordings

95-96 PDF

Many voices·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Get access to 167 years of
Harper’s for only $45.99

United States Canada

THE CURRENT ISSUE

March 2018

The Infinity of the Small

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Empty Suits

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

The Great Divide

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Nobody Knows

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

The Other Whisper Network

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

view Table Content

FEATURED ON HARPERS.ORG

Article
The Other Whisper Network·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

No one would talk to me for this piece. Or rather, more than twenty women talked to me, sometimes for hours at a time, but only after I promised to leave out their names, and give them what I began to call deep anonymity. This was strange, because what they were saying did not always seem that extreme. Yet here in my living room, at coffee shops, in my inbox and on my voicemail, were otherwise outspoken female novelists, editors, writers, real estate agents, professors, and journalists of various ages so afraid of appearing politically insensitive that they wouldn’t put their names to their thoughts, and I couldn’t blame them. 

Of course, the prepublication frenzy of Twitter fantasy and fury about this essay, which exploded in early January, is Exhibit A for why nobody wants to speak openly. Before the piece was even finished, let alone published, people were calling me “pro-rape,” “human scum,” a “harridan,” a “monster out of Stephen King’s ‘IT,’?” a “ghoul,” a “bitch,” and a “garbage person”—all because of a rumor that I was planning to name the creator of the so-called Shitty Media Men list. The Twitter feminist Jessica Valenti called this prospect “profoundly shitty” and “incredibly dangerous” without having read a single word of my piece. Other tweets were more direct: “man if katie roiphe actually publishes that article she can consider her career over.” “Katie Roiphe can suck my dick.” With this level of thought policing, who in their right mind would try to say anything even mildly provocative or original? 

Illustration by Shonagh Rae
Article
Pushing the Limit·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

In the early Eighties, Andy King, the coach of the Seawolves, a swim club in Danville, California, instructed Debra Denithorne, aged twelve, to do doubles — to practice in the morning and the afternoon. King told Denithorne’s parents that he saw in her the potential to receive a college scholarship, and even to compete in the Olympics. Tall swimmers have an advantage in the water, and by the time Denithorne turned thirteen, she was five foot eight. She dropped soccer and a religious group to spend more time at the pool.

Illustration by Shonagh Rae
Post
CamperForce·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

After losing their savings in the stock market crash of 2008, seniors Barb and Chuck find seasonal employment at Amazon fulfillment centers.

Percentage of U.S. gun retailers who believe that “it is too easy for criminals to get guns in this country”:

55

Alcohol increases straight men’s homophobia toward gay men but not lesbians.

US president Donald Trump, who once said it “doesn’t matter” what journalists write about him if he has a “piece of ass” that is “young,” blamed the press coverage of the abuse allegations on the White House communications director, whom Trump has reportedly called a “piece of tail” and asked to steam a pair of pants he was wearing.

Subscribe to the Weekly Review newsletter. Don’t worry, we won’t sell your email address!

HARPER’S FINEST

Report — From the June 2013 issue

How to Make Your Own AR-15

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

By

"Gun owners have long been the hypochondriacs of American politics. Over the past twenty years, the gun-rights movement has won just about every battle it has fought; states have passed at least a hundred laws loosening gun restrictions since President Obama took office. Yet the National Rifle Association has continued to insist that government confiscation of privately owned firearms is nigh. The NRA’s alarmism helped maintain an active membership, but the strategy was risky: sooner or later, gun guys might have realized that they’d been had. Then came the shootings at a movie theater in Aurora, Colorado, and at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, followed swiftly by the nightmare the NRA had been promising for decades: a dedicated push at every level of government for new gun laws. The gun-rights movement was now that most insufferable of species: a hypochondriac taken suddenly, seriously ill."

Subscribe Today