= Subscribers only. Sign in here. Subscribe here.

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

1893 / September | View All Issues |

September 1893

Editor’s drawer

1-2 PDF

Editor’s drawer·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.


Editor’s drawer

1-4 PDF

Editor’s drawer·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Editor’s drawer

2-3 PDF

Editor’s drawer·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Editor’s drawer

3-4 PDF

Editor’s drawer·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Poetry

488-489 PDF

When Phyllis laughs·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Article

489-506 PDF

A general election in England·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Poetry

506-507 PDF

September·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Fiction

508-530 PDF

The handsome Humes. A novel (chaps. XIII-XVI)·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Article

530-536 PDF

Edward Emerson Barnard·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Article

537-545 PDF

An Albert Dürer town·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Fiction

545-552 PDF

Gabriel, and the lost millions of Perote·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Reviews

553-560 PDF

The letters of James Russell Lowell·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Article

561-574 PDF

Texas·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Fiction

574-582 PDF

The general’s sword·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Article

582-595 PDF

Down Love Lane·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Fiction

595-602 PDF

Horace Chase (chaps. XX-XXI)·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Article

602-608 PDF

The diplomacy and law of the Isthmian canals·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Article

626-635 PDF

Riders of Egypt·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Editor’s study

635-636 PDF

— (I)·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Editor’s study

635-640 PDF

Editor’s study·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Editor’s study

636-637 PDF

— (II)·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Editor’s study

637-638 PDF

— (III)·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Editor’s study

638-639 PDF

— (IV)·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Editor’s study

639-640 PDF

— (V)·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Monthly record of current events

640 PDF

Monthly record of current events·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

illustration

641 PDF

Ante-posthumous jealousy·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Editor’s drawer

642-644 PDF

Her sympathetic editor·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Editor’s drawer

642-648 PDF

Editor’s drawer·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Editor’s drawer

644 PDF

Plenty to do·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Editor’s drawer

644 PDF

Willing to do his best·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Editor’s drawer

644-645 PDF

A discussion·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Editor’s drawer

645 PDF

Modest·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Editor’s drawer

645 PDF

A narrow escape·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Editor’s drawer

645 PDF

An impolite critic·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Editor’s drawer

646 PDF

A post-prandial failure·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Editor’s drawer

646 PDF

The facetious young man turned down·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Editor’s drawer

646 PDF

Three good strokes·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Editor’s drawer

647 PDF

A compliment·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Editor’s drawer

648 PDF

When he was a boy·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Editor’s drawer

648 PDF

Youthful veracity·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Editor’s drawer

2 PDF

Editor’s drawer·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Editor’s drawer

4 PDF

Editor’s drawer·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Editor’s drawer

4 PDF

Editor’s drawer·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Get access to 167 years of
Harper’s for only $45.99

United States Canada

THE CURRENT ISSUE

March 2018

Nobody Knows

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

The Other Whisper Network

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

The Infinity of the Small

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

Empty Suits

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

The Great Divide

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

view Table Content

FEATURED ON HARPERS.ORG

Article
The Other Whisper Network·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

No one would talk to me for this piece. Or rather, more than twenty women talked to me, sometimes for hours at a time, but only after I promised to leave out their names, and give them what I began to call deep anonymity. This was strange, because what they were saying did not always seem that extreme. Yet here in my living room, at coffee shops, in my inbox and on my voicemail, were otherwise outspoken female novelists, editors, writers, real estate agents, professors, and journalists of various ages so afraid of appearing politically insensitive that they wouldn’t put their names to their thoughts, and I couldn’t blame them. 

Of course, the prepublication frenzy of Twitter fantasy and fury about this essay, which exploded in early January, is Exhibit A for why nobody wants to speak openly. Before the piece was even finished, let alone published, people were calling me “pro-rape,” “human scum,” a “harridan,” a “monster out of Stephen King’s ‘IT,’?” a “ghoul,” a “bitch,” and a “garbage person”—all because of a rumor that I was planning to name the creator of the so-called Shitty Media Men list. The Twitter feminist Jessica Valenti called this prospect “profoundly shitty” and “incredibly dangerous” without having read a single word of my piece. Other tweets were more direct: “man if katie roiphe actually publishes that article she can consider her career over.” “Katie Roiphe can suck my dick.” With this level of thought policing, who in their right mind would try to say anything even mildly provocative or original? 

Illustration by Shonagh Rae
Article
Pushing the Limit·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

In the early Eighties, Andy King, the coach of the Seawolves, a swim club in Danville, California, instructed Debra Denithorne, aged twelve, to do doubles — to practice in the morning and the afternoon. King told Denithorne’s parents that he saw in her the potential to receive a college scholarship, and even to compete in the Olympics. Tall swimmers have an advantage in the water, and by the time Denithorne turned thirteen, she was five foot eight. She dropped soccer and a religious group to spend more time at the pool.

Illustration by Shonagh Rae
Post
CamperForce·

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

After losing their savings in the stock market crash of 2008, seniors Barb and Chuck find seasonal employment at Amazon fulfillment centers.

Days after the Columbine shootings in 1999 that Eric Holder called for “regulations in how people interact on the Internet‚”:

5

The 63 percent drop in Brazil’s birth rate between 1960 and 2000 was due in part to soap operas.

US president Donald Trump, who once said it “doesn’t matter” what journalists write about him if he has a “piece of ass” that is “young,” blamed the press coverage of the abuse allegations on the White House communications director, whom Trump has reportedly called a “piece of tail” and asked to steam a pair of pants he was wearing.

Subscribe to the Weekly Review newsletter. Don’t worry, we won’t sell your email address!

HARPER’S FINEST

Report — From the June 2013 issue

How to Make Your Own AR-15

= Subscribers only.
Sign in here.
Subscribe here.

By

"Gun owners have long been the hypochondriacs of American politics. Over the past twenty years, the gun-rights movement has won just about every battle it has fought; states have passed at least a hundred laws loosening gun restrictions since President Obama took office. Yet the National Rifle Association has continued to insist that government confiscation of privately owned firearms is nigh. The NRA’s alarmism helped maintain an active membership, but the strategy was risky: sooner or later, gun guys might have realized that they’d been had. Then came the shootings at a movie theater in Aurora, Colorado, and at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, followed swiftly by the nightmare the NRA had been promising for decades: a dedicated push at every level of government for new gun laws. The gun-rights movement was now that most insufferable of species: a hypochondriac taken suddenly, seriously ill."

Subscribe Today